MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2025.04.030

Медицинская библиотека · Heart & lung : the journal of critical care · 2025

Intravascular lithotripsy and temporary mechanical circulatory support for the treatment of heavily calcified coronary artery disease: insights from the BENELUX-IVL registry.

Oliveri Federico, Merino Isabel, van Oort Martjn J H, Al Amri Ibtihal, Bingen Brian O, Arslan Fatih, Claessen Bimmer E, Dimitriu-Leen Aukelien C, Kefer Joelle, Girgis Hany, Vossenberg Tessel, van der Kley Frank, Jukema J Wouter, Montero-Cabezas Josè

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is increasingly utilized for the treatment of heavily calcified coronary lesions. However its use in conjunction with temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) remains underexplored.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to evaluate the current use of tMCS and IVL for the treatment of heavily calcified coronary lesions.

METHOD: From the BENELUX-IVL prospective registry, patients who underwent IVL during PCI and required tMCS during the procedure were selected. The primary technical endpoint was procedural success <30%, defined as a composite of device success (the ability to deliver the IVL catheter across the target lesion, and delivery of IVL pulses without angiographic complications) with residual stenosis <30%, final Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction grade 3 flow, and no in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). The primary clinical outcome was in-hospital MACE, including cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization.

RESULTS

Between May 2019 and March 2024, a total of 454 patients were included, of whom 12 (2.6%) necessitated tMCS (for a total of 13 tMCS devices). Upon admission, the mean LV-EF was 39.5 ± 11.9%. The median Syntax score was 37 (25-49). A bail-out indication was the most common reason for tMCS initiation (58.3%), even if none was directly started due to IVL-related complications. Microaxial Flow Pump was the main utilized device (75%), followed by VA-ECMO (25%) and IABP (8.3%). One case required both VA-ECMO and Impella due to a coronary perforation complicated by cardiac tamponade. Procedural success < 30% was achieved in 91.6% of the cases. MACE occurred in one patient (8.3%).

CONCLUSION

In a large cohort of patients with complex heavily calcified coronary lesions requiring IVL, the need for tMCS was low (2.6%), with the main indication being bail-out.

Для цитирования: Oliveri Federico, Merino Isabel, van Oort Martjn J H, Al Amri Ibtihal, Bingen Brian O, Arslan Fatih, Claessen Bimmer E, Dimitriu-Leen Aukelien C, Kefer Joelle, Girgis Hany, Vossenberg Tessel, van der Kley Frank, Jukema J Wouter, Montero-Cabezas Josè. Intravascular lithotripsy and temporary mechanical circulatory support for the treatment of heavily calcified coronary artery disease: insights from the BENELUX-IVL registry.. Heart & lung : the journal of critical care. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2025.04.030.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.