MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)80021-4

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 1996

Is there a benefit to episiotomy at spontaneous vaginal delivery? A natural experiment.

Bansal R K, Tan W M, Ecker J L, Bishop J T, Kilpatrick S J

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to examine the association between maternal vaginal and perineal morbidity and episiotomy performed at spontaneous vaginal delivery.

STUDY

DESIGN

We obtained data from 17,483 consecutive spontaneous vaginal deliveries and compared the yearly rates of episiotomy, lacerations, and potential confounders with linear regression and stratified analyses.

RESULTS

Between 1976 and 1994 the use of episiotomy fell significantly (86.8% to 10.4%, R2 = 0.92, p = 0.0001). This change was associated with a fall in the rate of third- and fourth-degree lacerations (9.0% to 4.2%, R2 = 0.59, p = 0.0001) and a rise in the rate of intact perinea (10.3% to 26.5%, R2 = 0.68, p = 0.0001) and vaginal lacerations (5.4% to 19.3%, R2 = 0.77, p = 0.0001). These associations held in separate analyses stratified by parity and birth weight, except for the subgroup of nulliparous women with macrosomic infants.

CONCLUSION

At our institution a large reduction in the use of episiotomy in spontaneous vaginal deliveries was associated with a significant reduction in perineal trauma in all groups of women except for nulliparous women with macrosomic infants.

Для цитирования: Bansal R K, Tan W M, Ecker J L, Bishop J T, Kilpatrick S J. Is there a benefit to episiotomy at spontaneous vaginal delivery? A natural experiment.. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 1996. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)80021-4.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.