DOI 10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.107152
Intracranial findings associated with low odds of retinal hemorrhage among children under 2 years of age at a single pediatric trauma center.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Evaluation by a pediatric ophthalmologist to look for retinal hemorrhages (RH) is often part of screening for occult injury among young children with intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) presenting to a trauma center. While important, this examination may lengthen the time a child and family remain at the hospital.
OBJECTIVE
We sought to identify injury patterns associated with a low likelihood of RH, which may help streamline child abuse screening protocols for very young children with ICH.
METHODS, PARTICIPANTS AND
SETTING
We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all children at a single Pediatric Level I Trauma Center who were <24 months of age, had ICH diagnosed between January 1, 2016, and June 30, 2021, and had a complete fundoscopic examination by a pediatric ophthalmologist.
RESULTS
Of 177 children evaluated, 20 % had retinal hemorrhages. Odds of RH were very low among children with a single ICH directly underlying a skull fracture (uOR 0.05; 95 % CI 0.01-0.35), or with a single epidural hemorrhage (uOR 0.11; 95 % CI 0.01-0.84), compared to those with other intracranial injury patterns. Only one case in each group had RH: it was the same child, and the RH did not have the characteristics typically associated with abusive head trauma (AHT).
CONCLUSIONS
A dilated fundoscopic examination by a pediatric ophthalmologist may not be necessary in children <2 years of age with a single intracranial bleed directly below a skull fracture, or a single epidural hemorrhage, when there are no additional indicators of elevated AHT risk.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level III.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.