MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/08941939.2026.2666959

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of investigative surgery : the official journal of the Academy of Surgical Research · 2026

Vascular and Wound-Healing Implications of Single-Stage Versus Multistage Repair of Anorectal Malformations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Du Yu, Wang Yiwei, Wang Wenjing, Zhao Jingming

Систематический обзорСтатьяМетаанализСравнительное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Anorectal malformations (ARMs) are managed using either single-stage or multistage surgical repair. However, concerns persist regarding wound-related complications and long-term functional outcomes, which remain inconsistently reported across surgical approaches.

OBJECTIVE

To compare wound-related complications and long-term functional outcomes following single-stage versus multistage repair of ARMs, with emphasis on wound perfusion, dehiscence, and vascular healing dynamics.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; CRD420251006245). PubMed and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched for studies published between 2000 and 2024 comparing single-stage and staged ARM repair in neonates and infants. Outcomes included wound dehiscence, surgical site infection (SSI), stenosis, prolapse, redo surgery, constipation, soiling, and voluntary bowel movements. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Study quality was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS).

RESULTS

Nineteen studies involving 1,972 patients were included. Single-stage repair was associated with a significantly higher risk of wound dehiscence (OR 3.31; 95% CI 1.90-5.79; p < 0.0001), while no significant differences were observed for SSI, stenosis, prolapse, redo surgery, constipation, soiling, or voluntary bowel movements. Moderate to high heterogeneity was noted for selected outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Single-stage repair provides comparable infection rates and long-term functional outcomes to multistage surgery but carries an increased risk of wound dehiscence. Optimizing tissue perfusion and minimizing tension are essential to improve outcomes.

Для цитирования: Du Yu, Wang Yiwei, Wang Wenjing, Zhao Jingming. Vascular and Wound-Healing Implications of Single-Stage Versus Multistage Repair of Anorectal Malformations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.. Journal of investigative surgery : the official journal of the Academy of Surgical Research. 2026. DOI: 10.1080/08941939.2026.2666959.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.