European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
The impact of different bone cement distribution patterns on cement leakage in percutaneous curved vertebroplasty versus bilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhao Xuelin, Yin Yipeng, Li Lijun
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This study aims to investigate the impact of different bone cement distribution patterns on cement leakage in percutaneous curved vertebroplasty (PCVP) versus bilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP). We hypothesized that anteriorly displaced cement increases leakage risk and that PCVP produces a more anterior distribution than bilateral PVP.
METHODS: This retrospective analysis included 55 vertebrae treated with bilateral PVP between November 2021 and March 2023 and 60 vertebrae treated with PCVP between April 2023 and September 2024. Variables included age, gender, BMI, bone mineral density, surgical approach, cement distribution pattern (three-part classification on lateral radiographs), and postoperative cement leakage. We utilized a computer software-assisted radiographic analysis to localize the cement centroid and classify position (anterior/central/posterior). Univariate analyses were followed by logistic regression. Inter-observer reliability for the computer-assisted classification was assessed on a random subset [n = 30] using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Cohen's κ.
RESULTS: Cement leakage occurred in 28.6% of anterior, 3.8% of central, and 0% of posterior distributions (P < 0.001). Compared with bilateral PVP, PCVP yielded a substantially higher proportion of anterior distributions (56.5% vs. 29.1%) and a lower proportion of central distributions (32.6% vs. 65.5%; P < 0.001). In multivariable logistic regression, central versus anterior distribution was associated with markedly lower odds of leakage (adjusted OR 0.06, 95% CI 0.02-0.20; P < 0.001), whereas PCVP versus bilateral PVP was not significantly associated with leakage after adjusting for cement position (adjusted OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.27-3.52; P = 0.969).
CONCLUSION: Compared with bilateral PVP, PCVP tended to yield a more anterior cement distribution. An anterior distribution was strongly associated with a higher likelihood of cement leakage. Clinically, centering cement within the middle third-particularly during PCVP-may reduce leakage risk.
METHODS: This retrospective analysis included 55 vertebrae treated with bilateral PVP between November 2021 and March 2023 and 60 vertebrae treated with PCVP between April 2023 and September 2024. Variables included age, gender, BMI, bone mineral density, surgical approach, cement distribution pattern (three-part classification on lateral radiographs), and postoperative cement leakage. We utilized a computer software-assisted radiographic analysis to localize the cement centroid and classify position (anterior/central/posterior). Univariate analyses were followed by logistic regression. Inter-observer reliability for the computer-assisted classification was assessed on a random subset [n = 30] using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Cohen's κ.
RESULTS: Cement leakage occurred in 28.6% of anterior, 3.8% of central, and 0% of posterior distributions (P < 0.001). Compared with bilateral PVP, PCVP yielded a substantially higher proportion of anterior distributions (56.5% vs. 29.1%) and a lower proportion of central distributions (32.6% vs. 65.5%; P < 0.001). In multivariable logistic regression, central versus anterior distribution was associated with markedly lower odds of leakage (adjusted OR 0.06, 95% CI 0.02-0.20; P < 0.001), whereas PCVP versus bilateral PVP was not significantly associated with leakage after adjusting for cement position (adjusted OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.27-3.52; P = 0.969).
CONCLUSION: Compared with bilateral PVP, PCVP tended to yield a more anterior cement distribution. An anterior distribution was strongly associated with a higher likelihood of cement leakage. Clinically, centering cement within the middle third-particularly during PCVP-may reduce leakage risk.