Is the renal pyramidal thickness a good predictor for pyeloplasty in postnatal hydronephrosis?

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the feasibility and value of renal pyramidal thickness (PT) as a predictor of pyeloplasty in high-grade postnatal hydronephrosis.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the charts of patients who presented with postnatal hydronephrosis from 2008 to 2013. Included cases had grade 3 or 4 hydronephrosis. We included only units diagnosed as ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Gender, laterality, hydronephrosis side, renogram data, and follow-up data were recorded. Two investigators reviewed all patients' ultrasounds images. We measured PT and pelvic anteroposterior diameter (APD) in the last ultrasound before surgery. For those managed conservatively, measurements were obtained from the ultrasound with worst hydronephrosis. PT was measured in supine position in the middle third of the sagittal plane (Figure). We assessed the reliability of PT measurement using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to correlate the collected parameters to pyeloplasty incidence. Receiver operating characteristic curve was used to evaluate the cutoff value of PT that predicts pyeloplasty.

RESULTS

The total included cases were 155 patients (165 units). One hundred and fourteen units had grade 3 hydronephrosis and 51 units had grade 4 hydronephrosis. Fifty-two cases (55 units) underwent pyeloplasty. The median follow-up period was 37.6 months. PT measurement was reliable (ICC = 0.94). Univariate analysis revealed that SFU grading, APD, PT, T1/2, and MAG-3 curves were associated with surgery. Multivariate analysis showed that PT was a single independent predictor for pyeloplasty. PT ≤ 3 mm had 98.1% sensitivity and 89.7% specificity in predicting pyeloplasty.

DISCUSSION: PT is the first portion of renal parenchyma that is affected in high-grade hydronephrosis. Moreover, it changes little over the first 9 years of life. PT measurement in hydronephrosis was not previously evaluated. We found that PT was easily measured in most kidneys with high negative predictive value. The PT value as an indicator for pyeloplasty should undergo extensive assessment by other institutions with different protocols.

CONCLUSION

Being a slowly growing part of the parenchyma, PT can be a good measurable parameter to predict pyeloplasty. Measurement of PT in hydronephrosis is reliable. PT ≤ 3 mm can predict pyeloplasty with 98.1% sensitivity and 89.7% specificity.