MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1098/rstb.2010.0237

Медицинская библиотека · Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2011

Shaping the military wound: issues surrounding the reconstruction of injured servicemen at the Royal Centre for Defence Medicine.

Evriviades Demetrius, Jeffery Steven, Cubison Tania, Lawton Graham, Gill Martin, Mortiboy Deborah

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The conflict in Afghanistan has produced injuries similar to those produced from military conflicts for generations. What distinguishes the modern casualty of the conflict in Afghanistan from those of other conflicts is the effectiveness of modern field medical care that has led to individuals surviving with injuries, which would have been immediately fatal even a few years ago. These patients present several challenges to the reconstructive surgeon. These injured individuals present early challenges of massive soft-tissue trauma, unstable physiology, complex bony and soft-tissue defects, unusual infections, limited reconstructive donor sites, peripheral nerve injuries and traumatic amputations. Late challenges to rehabilitation include the development of heterotopic ossification in amputation stumps. This paper outlines the approach taken by the reconstructive team at the Royal Centre for Defence Medicine in managing these most difficult of reconstructive challenges.

Для цитирования: Evriviades Demetrius, Jeffery Steven, Cubison Tania, Lawton Graham, Gill Martin, Mortiboy Deborah. Shaping the military wound: issues surrounding the reconstruction of injured servicemen at the Royal Centre for Defence Medicine.. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences. 2011. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0237.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.