MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/bth.0b013e318070c716

Медицинская библиотека · Techniques in hand & upper extremity surgery · 2007

Long-term outcome of replantation of proximal-third amputated arm: a worthwhile endeavor.

Dagum Alexander B, Slesarenko Yury, Winston Lucy, Tottenham Virginia

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

We report a successful replantation of a proximal-third avulsed left arm in a 26-year-old female with maintenance of good functional, clinical, Short Form 36, and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand outcomes results at 10 years. An organized approach combining staged surgical reconstruction and intense hand therapy allowed for both successful replantation and outcome. There exist no clear guidelines in making the decision between replantation and revision amputation. Controversy regarding the value of upper limb replantation seems to increase with ascending levels of amputation. A case report cannot provide guidelines, but several points can be made that may be of help to hand surgeons confronting this uncommon situation. In a highly motivated patient with realistic expectation, a preoperatively intact functioning shoulder should be considered an indication for attempt at replantation. With further staged reconstruction, a helper arm can still be achieved even in an avulsion-type amputation. Current operative and perioperative aspects of microsurgical replantation and subsequent reconstruction are discussed.

Для цитирования: Dagum Alexander B, Slesarenko Yury, Winston Lucy, Tottenham Virginia. Long-term outcome of replantation of proximal-third amputated arm: a worthwhile endeavor.. Techniques in hand & upper extremity surgery. 2007. DOI: 10.1097/bth.0b013e318070c716.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.