MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/sap.0000000000002172

Медицинская библиотека · Annals of plastic surgery · 2020

Functional Outcomes of Surgical Management of Mandibular Condylar Head Fractures.

Lai Bo-Ru, Liao Han-Tsung

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Various procedures have been described for the management of mandibular condylar head fracture, but a standard treatment is not yet conclusive. This report describes our experience with osteosynthesis of condylar head fracture at Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital.

METHODS

Sixteen patients with unilateral or bilateral mandibular condylar head fractures diagnosed by computed tomography and treated by open reduction and internal fixation between August 2014 and September 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. A preauricular approach was consistently used for internal fixation with 2 microplates and 4 screws after anatomic reduction. Occlusion, maximum mouth opening (MMO), radiographic outcome, and complications were recorded.

RESULTS

Mean ± SD patient age was 29.5 ± 11.4 years, and mean ± SD procedure time was 264.3 ± 83.1 minutes. Mean ± SD postoperative MMO was 23.5 ± 10.2 mm at 1 month, 34.1 ± 8.6 mm at 3 months, 39.1 ± 5.7 mm at 6 months, and 40.0 ± 6.8 at 1 year. Early recovery of MMO of greater than 30 mm was achieved by 13 patients at 3 months after open reduction and internal fixation. There were no major complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Microplate fixation from the posterior aspect of the mandibular condylar head via the preauricular approach was safe for patients with mandibular condylar head fractures.

Для цитирования: Lai Bo-Ru, Liao Han-Tsung. Functional Outcomes of Surgical Management of Mandibular Condylar Head Fractures.. Annals of plastic surgery. 2020. DOI: 10.1097/sap.0000000000002172.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.