Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026
Incidence and Short- to Intermediate-Term Oncological Outcomes of Pathological T0 Prostate Cancer After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Multicenter, Retrospective Cohort Study in Japan (MSUG94 Group).
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tomioka-Inagawa Risa, Tomioka Masayuki, Tatenuma Tomoyuki, Sasaki Takeshi, Ikehata Yoshinori, Nakayama Akinori, Toide Masahiro, Yoneda Tatsuaki, Sakaguchi Kazushige, Makiyama Kazuhide, Inoue Takahiro, Kitamura Hiroshi, Saito Kazutaka, Koga Fumitaka, Urakami Shinji, Koie Takuya
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Pathological T0 (pT0) prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy is uncommon, and its prognostic significance remains unclear, particularly after neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT). We investigated the incidence of pT0 disease in a multicenter Japanese cohort and described postoperative biochemical recurrence (BCR) outcomes.
METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed 3079 patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy at nine Japanese centers between 2011 and 2021. Patients were classified as having pT0 or non-pT0 disease. Because only four pT0 cases occurred without NHT, these are summarized descriptively. Exploratory Kaplan-Meier and log-rank analyses of biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS) were performed for the NHT subgroup.
RESULTS: Twenty-seven pT0 cases (0.9%) were identified, and 85.2% were identified after NHT. Overall, 399 patients (13.0%) developed BCR. Among patients who did not undergo NHT, the 1- and 2-year BRFS rates were 100% and 100%, respectively, in the pT0 group and 92.4% and 88.1%, respectively, in the non-pT0 group. In the NHT subgroup, the corresponding rates were 92.9% and 92.7%, versus 91.8% and 85.5%, respectively (p = 0.651).
CONCLUSIONS: pT0 disease after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy is rare and occurs predominantly after NHT. Given the possibility that late-onset recurrences may have been overlooked, the results of this trial should be understood as providing evidence from the short- to intermediate-term perspective.
METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed 3079 patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy at nine Japanese centers between 2011 and 2021. Patients were classified as having pT0 or non-pT0 disease. Because only four pT0 cases occurred without NHT, these are summarized descriptively. Exploratory Kaplan-Meier and log-rank analyses of biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS) were performed for the NHT subgroup.
RESULTS: Twenty-seven pT0 cases (0.9%) were identified, and 85.2% were identified after NHT. Overall, 399 patients (13.0%) developed BCR. Among patients who did not undergo NHT, the 1- and 2-year BRFS rates were 100% and 100%, respectively, in the pT0 group and 92.4% and 88.1%, respectively, in the non-pT0 group. In the NHT subgroup, the corresponding rates were 92.9% and 92.7%, versus 91.8% and 85.5%, respectively (p = 0.651).
CONCLUSIONS: pT0 disease after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy is rare and occurs predominantly after NHT. Given the possibility that late-onset recurrences may have been overlooked, the results of this trial should be understood as providing evidence from the short- to intermediate-term perspective.