MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.08.019

Медицинская библиотека · Heart rhythm · 2013

Atypical complications encountered with epicardial electrophysiological procedures.

Killu Ammar M, Friedman Paul A, Mulpuru Siva K, Munger Thomas M, Packer Douglas L, Asirvatham Samuel J

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

With the increasing use, complexity, anatomical approaches, and tools related to epicardial procedures, complications previously not seen during endovascular ablation are now well recognized with epicardial ablation. Whether newer approaches and the regional anatomy of the pericardial space contribute to unexpected complications after epicardial access (EpiAcc) is presently unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize underreported, or novel, complications associated with percutaneous EpiAcc as part of an electrophysiology procedure.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed percutaneous EpiAcc as part of an ablation procedure from January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2011.

RESULTS

Of 116 attempts in 107 patients, 8 atypical ablation complications (no procedural deaths) were noted; complications included delayed pericarditis (2 weeks), chronic refractory pericarditis, requirement for snaring of broken intrapericardial wire, pleural perforation, phrenic nerve injury despite protective strategies, hemoperitoneum, and abdominal-pericardial fistula.

CONCLUSION

Vigilance both during and after EpiAcc is needed to recognize these complications, some of which may be life-threatening.

Для цитирования: Killu Ammar M, Friedman Paul A, Mulpuru Siva K, Munger Thomas M, Packer Douglas L, Asirvatham Samuel J. Atypical complications encountered with epicardial electrophysiological procedures.. Heart rhythm. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.08.019.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.