DOI 10.1016/j.jacig.2025.100583
Cephalosporin allergy: R1 side-chain and penicillin cross-reactivity patterns in an Australian cohort.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Cross-reactivity between cephalosporins, and penicillins, is mainly explained by R1 side-chain similarity. However, data on cross-reactivity patterns in cephalosporin-allergic patients, with and without preexisting penicillin allergy labels, are lacking.
OBJECTIVE
We sought to determine whether R1 side-chain groups account for cross-reactivity between cephalosporins, and penicillins with similar R groups, in a cohort of patients with cephalosporin allergy labels, with and without a penicillin allergy history.
METHODS
A retrospective audit (February 2016 to November 2021) of adult outpatients with cephalosporin allergy labels, who underwent skin prick / intradermal testing and/or oral provocation challenges, was performed at 2 Australian tertiary hospitals.
RESULTS
We identified 212 patients with a single cephalosporin allergy label; 97 had coexisting penicillin allergy labels. Fifty-eight (27.4%) patients were confirmed as allergic to the index cephalosporin (47 to cefazolin). The cephalosporin skin testing and oral provocation challenge results were adequately explained by R1 side-chain patterns. Most (87.5%) of the cephalosporin-allergic patients with penicillin allergy labels tolerated a penicillin challenge and were delabelled. However, positive penicillin skin test results were found in 5 (10.2%) cefazolin-allergic patients without preexisting penicillin allergy labels.
CONCLUSIONS
R1 side-chain groups explained most test outcomes in this study. However, some positive penicillin skin testing results were identified without a history of penicillin allergy. Future research investigating the safety of supervised graded penicillin challenges in cephalosporin-allergic patients is needed.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.