MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00120-016-0101-x

Медицинская библиотека · Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2016

[Cystocele and perineal ultrasound : Comparison of reliability and patient satisfaction].

Blum R, Blum G, Link G, Meinhold-Heerlein I, Najjari L

Сравнительное исследованиеОценочное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Pelvic organ prolapse is a common medical finding. The use of perineal ultrasound for diagnosis of cystoceles is gaining in importance.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this work was to test whether perineal ultrasound can be used to diagnose a cystocele before surgery and for follow-up examination. Furthermore, patient satisfaction during speculum examination and perineal ultrasound was compared.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

33 women with cystocele were examined before and after anterior colporrhaphy. Symptoms and satisfaction were documented with questionnaires.

RESULTS

Ultrasound measurements of both examiners were correlated before and after colporrhaphy. Also, the degree of cystocele and ultrasound were correlated during Valsalva after surgery. There was no clear relation between typical symptoms of the cystocele and ultrasound measurements. The patient's comfort is higher during ultrasound than during speculum examination (r = 0.45; p = 0.04. t = 4,418; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The results of the perineal ultrasound are reproducible before and after colporrhaphy. Patients prefer ultrasound to the speculum examination. A sonographic scale of the cystocele would extend the use of perineal ultrasound.

Для цитирования: Blum R, Blum G, Link G, Meinhold-Heerlein I, Najjari L. [Cystocele and perineal ultrasound : Comparison of reliability and patient satisfaction].. Der Urologe. Ausg. A. 2016. DOI: 10.1007/s00120-016-0101-x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.