Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery · 2014
Is routine chest X-ray after surgical and percutaneous tracheostomy necessary in adults: a systemic review of the current literature.
СтатьяСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yeo W X, Phua C Q, Lo S
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: For many years, routine post-tracheostomy chest X-ray has been the standard of care for patients in many countries. However, recent evidence suggests that this is unnecessary and cost-ineffective.
OBJECTIVE: To review the current literature and examine the role of routine post-tracheostomy chest X-ray in adult patients.
TYPE OF REVIEW: Systemic review.
SEARCH STRATEGY: Electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane) were searched using the keywords 'chest X-ray/radiography/radiograph' and 'tracheostomy/tracheotomy' in various permutations. Search period ranged from 1960 to 2012. Inclusion criteria included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomised control trials, prospective and retrospective case series. Paediatric and non-English articles were excluded. Abstracts and subsequently full text articles were screened by two of the authors independently. References from obtained articles were also examined.
EVALUATION METHOD: Specific outcome measures were collated to evaluate the usefulness of post-tracheostomy chest X-ray: Chest X-ray detected (tracheostomy-related) complication rates Proportion of cases requiring significant intervention Potential predictors of complications
RESULTS: Routine post-tracheostomy chest X-ray is of a low yield, and its findings had limited impact on patient management. Complication detection rates for surgical and percutaneous tracheostomy are 2.2% and 3.2%, respectively. Only 0.7% and 1.8% of chest X-rays performed in surgical and percutaneous tracheostomy cases, respectively, required intervention. Certain groups of patients, however, are at higher risks of complications, and may benefit from post-tracheostomy chest X-ray. For surgical tracheostomy, these groups include those with post-operative signs and symptoms of complications or had emergent or 'difficult' tracheostomies. For percutaneous tracheostomy, high-risk patients include trauma cases (unspecified), patients with post-procedural signs and symptoms of complications, patients who have high ventilatory requirements, difficult tracheostomy cases or tracheostomy cases performed without bronchoscopic guidance.
CONCLUSION: The practice of routine post-tracheostomy chest X-ray is debatable owing to its low yield and minimal impact on clinical management. However, certain groups of patients appear to be at higher risks of post-tracheostomy complications; currently, there is insufficient evidence to conclude the absolute need for routine chest X-ray in these groups of patients, although it may be prudent to do so based on available evidence in the literature and logical clinical reasoning.
OBJECTIVE: To review the current literature and examine the role of routine post-tracheostomy chest X-ray in adult patients.
TYPE OF REVIEW: Systemic review.
SEARCH STRATEGY: Electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane) were searched using the keywords 'chest X-ray/radiography/radiograph' and 'tracheostomy/tracheotomy' in various permutations. Search period ranged from 1960 to 2012. Inclusion criteria included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomised control trials, prospective and retrospective case series. Paediatric and non-English articles were excluded. Abstracts and subsequently full text articles were screened by two of the authors independently. References from obtained articles were also examined.
EVALUATION METHOD: Specific outcome measures were collated to evaluate the usefulness of post-tracheostomy chest X-ray: Chest X-ray detected (tracheostomy-related) complication rates Proportion of cases requiring significant intervention Potential predictors of complications
RESULTS: Routine post-tracheostomy chest X-ray is of a low yield, and its findings had limited impact on patient management. Complication detection rates for surgical and percutaneous tracheostomy are 2.2% and 3.2%, respectively. Only 0.7% and 1.8% of chest X-rays performed in surgical and percutaneous tracheostomy cases, respectively, required intervention. Certain groups of patients, however, are at higher risks of complications, and may benefit from post-tracheostomy chest X-ray. For surgical tracheostomy, these groups include those with post-operative signs and symptoms of complications or had emergent or 'difficult' tracheostomies. For percutaneous tracheostomy, high-risk patients include trauma cases (unspecified), patients with post-procedural signs and symptoms of complications, patients who have high ventilatory requirements, difficult tracheostomy cases or tracheostomy cases performed without bronchoscopic guidance.
CONCLUSION: The practice of routine post-tracheostomy chest X-ray is debatable owing to its low yield and minimal impact on clinical management. However, certain groups of patients appear to be at higher risks of post-tracheostomy complications; currently, there is insufficient evidence to conclude the absolute need for routine chest X-ray in these groups of patients, although it may be prudent to do so based on available evidence in the literature and logical clinical reasoning.