Submuscular Biological Plating Versus Flexible Nailing With External Fixation for Treating Unstable Pediatric Femoral Fractures.

BACKGROUND

The optimal surgical strategy for length-unstable pediatric femoral shaft fractures remains debated. This study compared clinical and radiologic outcomes between submuscular biological plating (SBP) and flexible intramedullary nailing augmented with external fixation (FIMN/EF).

METHODS

In this prospective, randomized trial, 32 children (5 to 14 years) with unstable femoral fractures (AO/OTA 32-D/5.1 or 32-D/5.2) were allocated to SBP (n=16) or FIMN/EF (n=16). Primary outcomes included operative time, fluoroscopy time, time to union, complications, and knee range of motion (ROM). Secondary outcomes included alignment, limb length discrepancy, functional scores (Flynn criteria), and implant removal characteristics.

RESULTS

The SBP group demonstrated shorter operative time than the FIMN/EF group (mean: 73.1 vs. 88.8 min, P =0.002) and reduced fluoroscopy time (mean: 51.9 vs. 74.1 s, P <0.001). Time to radiologic union was comparable between groups ( P >0.05). Knee flexion at final follow-up was greater in the SBP group (mean: 108.1 vs. 100.6 degrees, P =0.015). Complication rates and limb length discrepancies (≤10 mm) were similar in both groups, with no statistically significant difference. Functional outcomes were excellent or good in most patients in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Both SBP and FIMN/EF appear to be effective treatment options for selected length-unstable pediatric femoral shaft fractures. SBP offers shorter surgery, reduced radiation exposure, and better early knee ROM, whereas FIMN/EF provides easier implant removal. Technique selection should be based on patient factors, fracture pattern, surgeon experience, and family preference.