MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s10072-011-0582-8

Медицинская библиотека · Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2011

Prevalence of bifid median nerve at wrist assessed through ultrasound.

Granata Giuseppe, Caliandro Pietro, Pazzaglia Costanza, Minciotti Ileana, Russo Giuseppina, Martinoli Carlo, Padua Luca

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

We performed a prospective study to evaluate the prevalence of bifid median nerve (BMN) and if it has a higher prevalence in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) patients than symptom-free subjects. We evaluated by ultrasound (US) 162 median nerves at wrist of 89 consecutive patients with symptoms suggestive of CTS and 104 of 52 consecutive symptom-free subjects. Neurophysiological evaluation confirmed CTS diagnosis. All patients underwent ultrasonographic evaluation of median nerve in the elbow-palm segment through high-frequency probe; BMN was arbitrarily classified as "complete" and "incomplete" on the basis of US results. BMN was observed in 16/104 wrists (15.4%) in control group and in 30/162 (18.5%) wrists in CTS group. Our study showed that BMN is frequent, not always bilateral, more often is "incomplete" and it has similar prevalence in CTS and control group. These findings suggest that BMN is not a risk factor of developing CTS.

Для цитирования: Granata Giuseppe, Caliandro Pietro, Pazzaglia Costanza, Minciotti Ileana, Russo Giuseppina, Martinoli Carlo, Padua Luca. Prevalence of bifid median nerve at wrist assessed through ultrasound.. Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology. 2011. DOI: 10.1007/s10072-011-0582-8.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.