Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC · 2025
Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Practices for Obstetrical Infection Prevention in Alberta: A Multi-Method Study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ofosu Nicole N, Tate Jordan, Hruczkowski Charlotte, Feuffel Charlene, Collier Laurel, Mathe Nonsikelelo, Bruce Marcia, Campbell-Scherer Denise, Castillo Eliana
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Suboptimal antimicrobial prophylaxis in labour and delivery increases the risk of poor health outcomes. We examined Alberta's obstetrical antimicrobial prophylaxis practices to identify gaps and opportunities for clinical improvement.
METHODS: We used human-centred design (mapping out patients' journey to delivery) and health care administrative data to establish a baseline of current antimicrobial prophylaxis practices for early-onset neonatal group B Streptococcus (GBS) disease and surgical site infection (SSI) prevention during labour and delivery.
RESULTS: Seven obstetrical health care providers participated in the journey mapping process, which highlighted the need for improved allergy documentation. Specifically, the findings emphasized better penicillin allergy risk stratification, accurate electronic record-keeping, and identification of opportunities to de-label patients incorrectly identified as allergic. The analysis of 13 818 patients who delivered in Alberta hospital sites between November 1, 2022 and May 31, 2023 showed that most received appropriate antimicrobial prophylaxis for GBS and SSI prevention. Among the 140 GBS-positive patients with beta-lactam allergy who delivered vaginally, cefazolin (62%) was the most prescribed antibiotic, followed by clindamycin (26%) and penicillin (13%). Of the 58 patients with beta-lactam allergy needing SSI prophylaxis, most also received cefazolin. However, some cases still showed suboptimal use of second-line antibiotics.
CONCLUSIONS: The journey map highlights the prenatal period and hospital admission as key phases for ensuring allergy documentation accuracy. Considering that inappropriate penicillin allergy labelling and administration of suboptimal antimicrobial prophylaxis persist, there is room for quality improvement initiatives to promote validation of allergy status and address the use of suboptimal antibiotics for penicillin allergy.
METHODS: We used human-centred design (mapping out patients' journey to delivery) and health care administrative data to establish a baseline of current antimicrobial prophylaxis practices for early-onset neonatal group B Streptococcus (GBS) disease and surgical site infection (SSI) prevention during labour and delivery.
RESULTS: Seven obstetrical health care providers participated in the journey mapping process, which highlighted the need for improved allergy documentation. Specifically, the findings emphasized better penicillin allergy risk stratification, accurate electronic record-keeping, and identification of opportunities to de-label patients incorrectly identified as allergic. The analysis of 13 818 patients who delivered in Alberta hospital sites between November 1, 2022 and May 31, 2023 showed that most received appropriate antimicrobial prophylaxis for GBS and SSI prevention. Among the 140 GBS-positive patients with beta-lactam allergy who delivered vaginally, cefazolin (62%) was the most prescribed antibiotic, followed by clindamycin (26%) and penicillin (13%). Of the 58 patients with beta-lactam allergy needing SSI prophylaxis, most also received cefazolin. However, some cases still showed suboptimal use of second-line antibiotics.
CONCLUSIONS: The journey map highlights the prenatal period and hospital admission as key phases for ensuring allergy documentation accuracy. Considering that inappropriate penicillin allergy labelling and administration of suboptimal antimicrobial prophylaxis persist, there is room for quality improvement initiatives to promote validation of allergy status and address the use of suboptimal antibiotics for penicillin allergy.