European annals of otorhinolaryngology, head and neck diseases · 2014
French Otorhinolaryngology Society guidelines for day-case nasal surgery.
СтатьяКлинические рекомендацииНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
de Gabory L, Serrano E, Lecanu J-B, Ebbo D, Coudert F, Hanau M, Escabasse V, French Otorhinolaryngology Society (SFORL)
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The French Otorhinolaryngology Society (SFORL) set up a work group to draw up a consensus document on day-case surgery in four rhinologic procedures: endoscopic middle meatal antrostomy (French National Health Insurance (CCAM) code GBPE001), septoplasty (GAMA007), and reduction of nasal bone fracture using a direct approach (LAEA007) and using a closed technique (LAEP002).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Methodology followed the French Health Authority (HAS) "Methodological Bases for Drawing Up Professional Guidelines by Formalized Consensus" published in January 2006; the method chosen was the short version of the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method (without editorial group), as the work group topic was highly specialized, with few experts available.
RESULTS: Ahead of any day-case sinonasal surgery, it is recommended that patient eligibility criteria be respected and hemorrhagic risk assessed; preference should be given to short procedures involving little variation in surgery time and minimizing blood-loss, and associated procedures (e.g., septoplasty+turbinectomy) should be avoided. The patient and family should be informed of specific hemorrhagic, orbital and/or neuromeningeal risks, onset of which may preclude discharge home. Uni- or bilateral postoperative nasal packing is not a contraindication to day-case management.
CONCLUSION: All four procedures may be performed on a day-case basis. Eligibility criteria should be systematically respected, but hemorrhagic risk, which is very specific to the sinonasal organ, is to be assessed on a case-by-case basis, as it is a major issue in this kind of management for a non-negligible number of patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Methodology followed the French Health Authority (HAS) "Methodological Bases for Drawing Up Professional Guidelines by Formalized Consensus" published in January 2006; the method chosen was the short version of the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method (without editorial group), as the work group topic was highly specialized, with few experts available.
RESULTS: Ahead of any day-case sinonasal surgery, it is recommended that patient eligibility criteria be respected and hemorrhagic risk assessed; preference should be given to short procedures involving little variation in surgery time and minimizing blood-loss, and associated procedures (e.g., septoplasty+turbinectomy) should be avoided. The patient and family should be informed of specific hemorrhagic, orbital and/or neuromeningeal risks, onset of which may preclude discharge home. Uni- or bilateral postoperative nasal packing is not a contraindication to day-case management.
CONCLUSION: All four procedures may be performed on a day-case basis. Eligibility criteria should be systematically respected, but hemorrhagic risk, which is very specific to the sinonasal organ, is to be assessed on a case-by-case basis, as it is a major issue in this kind of management for a non-negligible number of patients.