Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2026
Targeting the DNA-repair chromatin-modifier protein SMYD3 as a novel epigenetics-based therapy for gastric cancer.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
De Marco Katia, Latrofa Marialaura, Forte Giovanna, Lepore Signorile Martina, Di Nicola Elisabetta, Sanese Paola, Fasano Candida, Disciglio Vittoria, Candela Erica, Coletta Sergio, Grossi Valentina, Simone Cristiano
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: SMYD3 is a histone methyltransferase implicated in cancer progression and is overexpressed in several malignancies, including gastric cancer (GC). Building on previous evidence linking SMYD3 to DNA damage repair, we investigated the molecular mechanisms through which SMYD3 regulates double-strand break (DSB) repair in GC and evaluated its therapeutic potential.
METHODS: In silico and in vitro analyses were performed to investigate the interactions between SMYD3 and key homologous recombination (HR) proteins, and to evaluate the ATM-mediated phosphorylation of SMYD3. Functional assays assessed the impact of pharmacological SMYD3 inhibition on HR and non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) repair pathways.
RESULTS: Mechanistically, SMYD3 interacted with key HR factors and facilitated chromatin remodeling at damaged sites. ATM phosphorylated SMYD3 at threonine 22, a modification required for HR complex assembly and validated in GC patient samples following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Inhibition of SMYD3 abolished HR and partially impaired NHEJ. Combined inhibition of SMYD3 and PARP induced synthetic lethality in GC cells, spheroids, and patient-derived organoids, and overcame resistance to olaparib.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings reveal the ATM-dependent molecular mechanism by which SMYD3 regulates DNA DSB repair, further supporting SMYD3 as a promising therapeutic target for precision oncology strategies in GC.
METHODS: In silico and in vitro analyses were performed to investigate the interactions between SMYD3 and key homologous recombination (HR) proteins, and to evaluate the ATM-mediated phosphorylation of SMYD3. Functional assays assessed the impact of pharmacological SMYD3 inhibition on HR and non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) repair pathways.
RESULTS: Mechanistically, SMYD3 interacted with key HR factors and facilitated chromatin remodeling at damaged sites. ATM phosphorylated SMYD3 at threonine 22, a modification required for HR complex assembly and validated in GC patient samples following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Inhibition of SMYD3 abolished HR and partially impaired NHEJ. Combined inhibition of SMYD3 and PARP induced synthetic lethality in GC cells, spheroids, and patient-derived organoids, and overcame resistance to olaparib.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings reveal the ATM-dependent molecular mechanism by which SMYD3 regulates DNA DSB repair, further supporting SMYD3 as a promising therapeutic target for precision oncology strategies in GC.