Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals · 1998
Quantitative prediction of the interaction of midazolam and histamine H2 receptor antagonists in rats.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Takedomi S, Matsuo H, Yamano K, Yamamoto K, Iga T, Sawada Y
Аннотация
To quantitatively evaluate drug-drug interactions involving metabolic processes in the liver, we attempted to predict the increasing ratio of the plasma concentration of midazolam (MDZ) in the presence of cimetidine (CIM) or nizatidine (NZD) in rats. Under steady-state conditions for the plasma concentration of CIM or NZD, MDZ was administered through the portal vein. The AUC of MDZ in the presence of CIM was 2.5-fold higher than that in the absence of CIM. There was no effect of NZD on the AUC of MDZ. The liver/plasma concentration ratios for CIM and NZD were 4.0 and 2.7, respectively. The estimated liver unbound concentration (CH,f)/plasma unbound concentration (Cp,f) ratios for CIM and NZD were 1.9 and 2.4, respectively, suggesting concentrative hepatic accumulation of both drugs. The oxidative metabolism of MDZ in rat liver microsomes was competitively inhibited by CIM or NZD, and the Ki values of CIM and NZD were 110 and 2600 microM, respectively. Based on these data obtained in vivo and in vitro, the increasing ratios for MDZ in the presence of CIM or NZD were predicted using the equations Rp = 1 + Cp,f/Ki and RH = 1 + CH,f/Ki. The observed increasing ratios in the presence of CIM were very close to RH, compared with Rp. However, Cp, f and CH,f were much less than Ki and there was no difference between Rp and RH in the presence of NZD. Consequently, Cp,f and CH, f were greater than or equal to Ki and Cp,f was not equal to CH,f, as in the presence of CIM, and it was indicated that CH,f was more suitable for quantitatively predicting the drug-drug interactions than was Cp,f.