MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of reproductive medicine · 2015

Predictors of Follow-Up in Women with Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia 2-3.

Wysham Weiya Z, Campbell Sara, Garcia Katelyn, Smith Jennifer, Rahangdale Lisa

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To describe a cohort of women receiving care after abnormal Pap smears and to assess predictors of follow-up in a cohort of women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2-3.

STUDY

DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study of women attending a colposcopy clinic in 2011. Data was collected by chart review and a bivariate analysis was performed to identify predictors of follow-up.

RESULTS

In 2011, 21% (156/745) of women attending a colposcopy clinic at a tertiary medical center were diagnosed with CIN 2-3. Of those women 79% returned to the clinic for their recommended follow-up procedures within 8 months. Of the following factors-severity of diagnosis, age, race/ethnicity, health insurance status, language, distance to clinic, and tobacco/contraception! condom use-only young age (< 29 years) was associated with late or lack of follow-up in bivariate analysis (odds ratio 2.67, 95% confidence interval 1.10-6.83). When women under age 21 were excluded, this association was no longer observed (OR 2.31, 95% CI 0.92-6.06).

CONCLUSION

In this cohort of mostly uninsured women, overall follow-up for a CIN 2-3 diagnosis was high. No single factor predictive for follow-up was identified in appropriately screened women.

Для цитирования: Wysham Weiya Z, Campbell Sara, Garcia Katelyn, Smith Jennifer, Rahangdale Lisa. Predictors of Follow-Up in Women with Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia 2-3.. The Journal of reproductive medicine. 2015.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.