DOI 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000909
Decreasing Prescriber Errors in a Tertiary Care Pediatric Intensive Care Unit via QI Methodology.
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION
Medication errors are a significant source of preventable adverse drug events for pediatric patients, particularly those with a complex chronic condition (CCC). In our pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), medication errors often occurred during admission or as medication regimens were adjusted throughout hospitalization. Our primary aim was to reduce the rate of reported prescriber medication errors per 1,000 medication orders by 40% between August 2022 and June 2024.
METHODS
Key drivers contributing to prescriber medication errors included the lack of a standardized medication reconciliation process, high-risk medications unintentionally expiring, and the difficulty of reconciling the home medication list for patients with a CCC. Five plan-do-study-act interventions were completed. A retrospective chart review was used for all baseline data. The primary outcome was the rate of reported monthly prescriber medication errors per 1,000 medication orders placed. This project took place in a 26-bed PICU within an urban, tertiary care children's hospital.
RESULTS
The rate of reported prescriber medication errors remained stable throughout the intervention period without evidence of special cause variation. However, admission medication reconciliation errors among children with CCCs decreased by a mean of 43% over time, with a downward centerline shift.
CONCLUSIONS
A multidisciplinary quality improvement approach was associated with improvement in medication reconciliation processes for children with CCCs. Pharmacy-supported medication reconciliation and standardized workflows were associated with fewer admission medication reconciliation errors in this high-risk population.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.