MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2026.1737252

Медицинская библиотека · Frontiers in immunology · 2026

Efficacy and safety of the single-dose pegylated G-CSF vs. daily G-CSF for peripheral blood stem cells mobilization in donors: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial.

Li Jiali, Zhou Sha, Li Xiaoping, Ma Xiangyu, Wang Sanbin, Zhang Yicheng, Lou Shifeng, Rao Jun, Wang Ping, Zhu Lidan, Chen Ting, Xiang Xixi, Gao Shichun, Yao Han, Kong Peiyan, Gao Lei, Zhang Cheng, Zhang Xi, Gao Li

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells(PBSC) needs daily injection of granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), which brings inconvenience to healthy donors. Can pegylated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (Peg-G-CSF) solve this problem by single dose injection?

METHODS

This multicenter, randomized controlled study was conducted from May 2018 to April 2019. Eligible donors were randomly selected to received treatment with 12 mg Peg-G-CSF on day 1 or 10 µg/kg/d G-CSF consecutively from day 1. PBSC apheresis of the donors was conducted on day 5. The primary endpoint was the percentage of donors who collected ≥4×106 CD34+cells/kg recipient weight after single apheresis.

RESULTS

Eighty (83.3%) of 96 donors in the Peg-G-SCF group and 76 (79.2%) of 96 donors in the G-CSF group collected ≥4×106 CD34+cells/kg recipient weight. The peak value of circulating CD34+ cell count occurred on day 5 in both groups. The median yield of CD34+ cell collected in the Peg-G-CSF group was comparable to that in the G-CSF group by a single apheresis procedure. Moreover, the incidence of side effects in both groups was similarly, no significant difference was observed in engraftment, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) or survival between the two groups of recipients. By multivariate analysis, The CD34+ cell count on the fifth day was the variable that may have significantly affected the CD34+ yield.

CONCLUSION

Mobilization via a single injection of Peg-G-CSF can match traditional G-CSF mobilization in terms of efficacy and safety and is expected to provide a better alternative to traditional G-CSF mobilization.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.chictr.org.cn, identifier ChiCTR1800015716.

Для цитирования: Li Jiali, Zhou Sha, Li Xiaoping, Ma Xiangyu, Wang Sanbin, Zhang Yicheng, Lou Shifeng, Rao Jun, Wang Ping, Zhu Lidan, Chen Ting, Xiang Xixi, Gao Shichun, Yao Han, Kong Peiyan, Gao Lei, Zhang Cheng, Zhang Xi, Gao Li. Efficacy and safety of the single-dose pegylated G-CSF vs. daily G-CSF for peripheral blood stem cells mobilization in donors: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial.. Frontiers in immunology. 2026. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2026.1737252.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.