DOI 10.3389/fnins.2025.1619467
Pathological respiratory chemoreflex activation predicts improvement of neurocognitive function in response to continuous positive airway pressure therapy.
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION
There is a need for biomarkers predicting neurocognitive improvement following treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). The role of sleep apnea endotypes as predictors are promising.
OBJECTIVE
To assess the relationship between a high loop gain biomarker, elevated low frequency narrow band (e-LFCNB), and improvements in neurocognitive function in the Apnea Positive Pressure Long-term Efficacy Study (APPLES).
METHODS
The e-LFCNB % metric was estimated on baseline polysomnography. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the potential association between e-LFCNB% of total sleep time and the observed improvement in neurocognitive function following the specified treatment.
RESULTS
A total of 362 subjects received CPAP and had e-LFCNB % measurements. For Sustained Working Memory Test-Overall Mid-Day (SWMT-OMD), e-LFCNB% > 2.35% correlates positively with the proportion of participants who showed an increase in test scores > 0.65 after 2 months CPAP treatment (OR: 2.617, 95% CI: 1.095-6.252, p: 0.030); e-LFCNB% > 9.45% correlates positively with improvement in test scores > 0.8 after 6 months CPAP treatment (OR: 2.553, 95% CI: 1.017-6.409, p: 0.046). For Buschke Selective Reminding Test sum recall (BSRT-SR), e-LFCNB% > 3.65% correlates positively with an increase in test scores > 12 after 2 months CPAP treatment (OR: 2.696, 95% CI: 1.041-6.982, p: 0.041). Results of the Pathfinder Number Test-Total Time (PFN-TOTL) were not significant.
CONCLUSION
e-LFCNB% (probable high loop gain) may be a clinically useful predictor of cognitive improvement following CPAP.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.