MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Zhonghua nan ke xue = National journal of andrology · 2020

[One-glass test for diagnosis and classification of chronic prostatitis: A randomized double-blind controlled multicentered clinical trial].

Li Lu, He Wei, Chen Zhi-Qiang, Xu Hua, Lan Ru-Zhu

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To compare a new method "one-glass test" with the international gold standard "four-glass test" for the classification of chronic prostatitis (CP).

METHODS

Totally, 360 CP patients were randomly assigned to receive "one-glass test" (n = 240) and "four-glass test" (n = 120) for the classification of the disease. Urine and expressed prostatic secretion (EPS) samples were collected from all the patients for microscopic and bacteriological examination and the results were subjected to statistical analysis, followed by comparison of the safety, procedures and costs of the two strategies.

RESULTS

Compared with the "four-glass test", the urethal membrane "one-glass test" showed a significantly higher accuracy in the classification of types Ⅱ (8.6%), ⅢA (50.0%) and ⅢB prostatitis (41.4%) (P < 0.05), simpler procedures and lower costs, reducing RMB ¥412 (61.24%) per case.

CONCLUSIONS

The "one-glass test" has a high accuracy in the diagnosis and classification of chronic prostatitis and the advantages of simple operation and low cost, and therefore can be used in place of the "four-glass test" and widely promoted clinically.

Для цитирования: Li Lu, He Wei, Chen Zhi-Qiang, Xu Hua, Lan Ru-Zhu. [One-glass test for diagnosis and classification of chronic prostatitis: A randomized double-blind controlled multicentered clinical trial].. Zhonghua nan ke xue = National journal of andrology. 2020.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.