MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/00016480600895151

Медицинская библиотека · Acta oto-laryngologica · 2007

Clinical results of rehabilitation for accessory nerve palsy after radical neck dissection.

Shimada Yoichi, Chida Satoaki, Matsunaga Toshiki, Sato Mineyoshi, Hatakeyama Kazutoshi, Itoi Eiji

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

CONCLUSIONS

Occupational therapy significantly improves shoulder range of motion in patients with accessory nerve palsy after radical neck dissection, but it has limited effects on the associated pain.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the outcome of occupational therapy rehabilitation for patients with accessory nerve palsy.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

The occupational therapy group involved 35 shoulders of 29 patients with accessory nerve palsy after radical neck dissection; the control group included 10 shoulders of 9 patients who did not receive occupational therapy. All patients had a malignant tumor in the head or neck that necessitated radical neck dissection. We collected data pertaining to resting pain, motion pain, and the active and passive range of motion during shoulder flexion and abduction.

RESULTS

Occupational therapy did not adequately relieve resting or motion pain, but all patients achieved independence in activities of daily living and housekeeping activities. Although occupational therapy significantly improved shoulder elevation for all movements, shoulder elevation was significantly better for flexion than for active and passive abduction.

Для цитирования: Shimada Yoichi, Chida Satoaki, Matsunaga Toshiki, Sato Mineyoshi, Hatakeyama Kazutoshi, Itoi Eiji. Clinical results of rehabilitation for accessory nerve palsy after radical neck dissection.. Acta oto-laryngologica. 2007. DOI: 10.1080/00016480600895151.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.