Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association · 2006
Arthroscopic debridement in the treatment of patients with isolated tears of the subscapularis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Edwards T Bradley, Walch Gilles, Nové-Josserand Laurent, Boulahia Aziz, Neyton Lionel, O'Connor Daniel P, Williams Matthew D
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate the treatment of properly selected patients with isolated subscapularis tears by arthroscopic debridement and release of the long head of the biceps.
METHODS: Eleven shoulders that had undergone arthroscopic debridement in the treatment of subscapularis tears were reviewed. In all patients, 3 months of appropriate nonoperative management had been unsuccessful. Patients were selected for arthroscopic debridement if the tear was thought to be irreparable, or if the patient was older and unwilling to participate in the rehabilitation required after repair had been completed. Mean age at surgery was 64 years. The mean time interval from onset of symptoms to surgery was 11 months. Seven tears were traumatic, and 4 were degenerative. Four tears involved the superior third of the subscapularis tendon, 2 involved the superior two thirds of the subscapularis tendon, and 5 were complete tears. Nine shoulders also had dislocation or subluxation of the long head of the biceps tendon; these patients underwent concomitant biceps tenotomy. Patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically at a mean 34-month follow-up (range, 24 to 48 months).
RESULTS: The mean Constant score increased from 49 points preoperatively to 80 points postoperatively (P < .0001). Nine patients were satisfied or very satisfied with the results. Preoperatively, 2 patients had mild glenohumeral arthritis. Postoperatively, radiographs demonstrated no progression of arthritis and no new-onset arthritis in these 2 patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The combination of arthroscopic debridement and biceps tenotomy in the treatment of subscapularis tears with biceps disease in selected patients yields good objective improvement and a high degree of patient satisfaction.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.
METHODS: Eleven shoulders that had undergone arthroscopic debridement in the treatment of subscapularis tears were reviewed. In all patients, 3 months of appropriate nonoperative management had been unsuccessful. Patients were selected for arthroscopic debridement if the tear was thought to be irreparable, or if the patient was older and unwilling to participate in the rehabilitation required after repair had been completed. Mean age at surgery was 64 years. The mean time interval from onset of symptoms to surgery was 11 months. Seven tears were traumatic, and 4 were degenerative. Four tears involved the superior third of the subscapularis tendon, 2 involved the superior two thirds of the subscapularis tendon, and 5 were complete tears. Nine shoulders also had dislocation or subluxation of the long head of the biceps tendon; these patients underwent concomitant biceps tenotomy. Patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically at a mean 34-month follow-up (range, 24 to 48 months).
RESULTS: The mean Constant score increased from 49 points preoperatively to 80 points postoperatively (P < .0001). Nine patients were satisfied or very satisfied with the results. Preoperatively, 2 patients had mild glenohumeral arthritis. Postoperatively, radiographs demonstrated no progression of arthritis and no new-onset arthritis in these 2 patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The combination of arthroscopic debridement and biceps tenotomy in the treatment of subscapularis tears with biceps disease in selected patients yields good objective improvement and a high degree of patient satisfaction.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.