MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.5664/jcsm.11904

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2025

Classifying hypopneas as obstructive or central can enhance transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation therapy patient selection and outcomes.

Dupuy-McCauley Kara, Schwartz Alan R, Javaheri Shahrokh, Germany Robin, McKane Scott, Morgenthaler Timothy I

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

STUDY

OBJECTIVES

While not all sleep laboratories distinguish between obstructive and central hypopneas, recent research suggests that patients may receive an incorrect primary diagnosis without this effort. The remedē System Pivotal Trial studied transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation in patients with moderate-to-severe central sleep apnea. Entry criteria required apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 20 events/h with central apnea index greater than obstructive apnea index and obstructive apneas < 20% of AHI but did not classify hypopneas. This analysis re-examined sleep studies from the trial to assess hypopnea classification impact on candidacy and treatment outcomes.

METHODS

Hypopneas were classified as central vs obstructive by a sleep core laboratory following a modified version of American Academy of Sleep Medicine recommended criteria. AHI composition was assessed pre/post treatment.

RESULTS

At baseline, 91% (138/151) of patients had ≥ 50% of events classified as central accounting for hypopnea classification. If all hypopneas were assumed obstructive, only 63% (95/151) would have had ≥ 50% central events. The likelihood of achieving ≥ 50% AHI reduction increased with the percentage of baseline events that were central: responder rates were 37.5% for patients with < 50% central events, incrementally increasing to 76.5% for those with ≥ 90% central events. At 6 months, residual AHI predominantly consisted of obstructive hypopneas. Central events decreased by 89% with treatment (baseline median 32 events/h). Obstructive apneas and hypopneas increased by 2 and 3 events/h, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Distinguishing central from obstructive hypopneas is required to accurately determine the proportion of central and obstructive breathing events, and is crucial for appropriate therapy selection and managing patient expectations about treatment outcomes.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Name: Respicardia, Inc. Pivotal Trial of the remede System; URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01816776, Identifier: NCT01816776.

CITATION: Dupuy-McCauley K, Schwartz AR, Javaheri S, Germany R, McKane S, Morgenthaler TI. Classifying hypopneas as obstructive or central can enhance transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation therapy patient selection and outcomes. J Clin Sleep Med. 2025;21(12):2113-2120.

Для цитирования: Dupuy-McCauley Kara, Schwartz Alan R, Javaheri Shahrokh, Germany Robin, McKane Scott, Morgenthaler Timothy I. Classifying hypopneas as obstructive or central can enhance transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation therapy patient selection and outcomes.. Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. 2025. DOI: 10.5664/jcsm.11904.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.