DOI 10.4274/tjod.galenos.2026.12428
Vulvar re-antisepsis and urinary tract infection after CO2 cystoscopy in laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate whether vulvar re-antisepsis before carbon dioxide (CO2) cystoscopy after laparoscopic hysterectomy is associated with a lower incidence of postoperative urinary tract infection (UTI).
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
This prospective observational study included 98 women who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy between November 25, 2025, and March 1, 2026. All patients received routine preoperative abdominal and vulvovaginal preparation with 10% povidone-iodine. According to routine intraoperative practice and surgeon preference, 53 patients underwent standard antisepsis alone, and 45 received additional vulvar and periurethral re-antisepsis immediately before CO2 cystoscopy. The primary outcome was a postoperative UTI, defined according to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/National Healthcare Safety Network criteria. Logistic regression was used to explore factors associated with postoperative UTI. The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT07232446).
RESULTS
Postoperative UTI occurred in 8 patients (15.1%) in the standard antisepsis group and in 4 patients (8.9%) in the re-antisepsis group (p=0.538). Vulvar re-antisepsis was not associated with postoperative UTI in the exploratory multivariable model [adjusted odds ratio (OR)=0.89, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.19-4.23; p=0.881]. Delayed catheter removal (>6 hours) was associated with postoperative UTI (adjusted OR=12.87, 95% CI: 2.13-77.62; p=0.005).
CONCLUSION
Vulvar re-antisepsis before CO2 cystoscopy did not result in a statistically significant reduction in postoperative UTIs. Given the limited number of events and the non-randomized design, these findings should be interpreted as exploratory.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.