Child: care, health and development · 2026
Exploring Relations Between Psychological Capital, Social Support and Self-Compassion Among Siblings of Individuals With Developmental Disabilities.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hazan-Liran Batel, Walter Ofra
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: We examined correlations between psychological capital (PsyCap), social support and self-compassion among siblings of individuals with developmental disabilities versus siblings of individuals without developmental disabilities.
METHODS: We hypothesized that (1) there would be positive correlations between PsyCap, social support and self-compassion at the sample level and within each group; (2) siblings of individuals without developmental disabilities would exhibit lower levels of these variables than siblings of individuals with developmental disabilities; and (3) relations between social support and self-compassion would be mediated by PsyCap in both groups. We surveyed 154 adults aged 18-71 years, including 42 siblings of individuals with developmental disabilities (19-71 years) and 112 siblings of individuals without developmental disabilities (18-71 years).
RESULTS: Results indicated significant positive correlations between PsyCap, social support and self-compassion at the sample level and among siblings of individuals without developmental disabilities. As hypothesized, PsyCap mediated relations between social support and self-compassion. Contrary to expectations, no significant differences were found between the two groups in levels of PsyCap, social support or self-compassion.
CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that PsyCap constitutes a key internal psychological resource that supports self-compassion among siblings, including those of individuals with developmental disabilities, highlighting its potential value as a target for interventions promoting sibling well-being.
METHODS: We hypothesized that (1) there would be positive correlations between PsyCap, social support and self-compassion at the sample level and within each group; (2) siblings of individuals without developmental disabilities would exhibit lower levels of these variables than siblings of individuals with developmental disabilities; and (3) relations between social support and self-compassion would be mediated by PsyCap in both groups. We surveyed 154 adults aged 18-71 years, including 42 siblings of individuals with developmental disabilities (19-71 years) and 112 siblings of individuals without developmental disabilities (18-71 years).
RESULTS: Results indicated significant positive correlations between PsyCap, social support and self-compassion at the sample level and among siblings of individuals without developmental disabilities. As hypothesized, PsyCap mediated relations between social support and self-compassion. Contrary to expectations, no significant differences were found between the two groups in levels of PsyCap, social support or self-compassion.
CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that PsyCap constitutes a key internal psychological resource that supports self-compassion among siblings, including those of individuals with developmental disabilities, highlighting its potential value as a target for interventions promoting sibling well-being.