MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1056/nejmoa054605

Медицинская библиотека · The New England journal of medicine · 2006

Laparotomy versus peritoneal drainage for necrotizing enterocolitis and perforation.

Moss R Lawrence, Dimmitt Reed A, Barnhart Douglas C, Sylvester Karl G, Brown Rebeccah L, Powell David M, Islam Saleem, Langer Jacob C, Sato Thomas T, Brandt Mary L, Lee Hanmin, Blakely Martin L, Lazar Eric L, Hirschl Ronald B, Kenney Brian D, Hackam David J, Zelterman Daniel, Silverman Bonnie L

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Perforated necrotizing enterocolitis is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in premature infants, and the optimal treatment is uncertain. We designed this multicenter randomized trial to compare outcomes of primary peritoneal drainage with laparotomy and bowel resection in preterm infants with perforated necrotizing enterocolitis.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 117 preterm infants (delivered before 34 weeks of gestation) with birth weights less than 1500 g and perforated necrotizing enterocolitis at 15 pediatric centers to undergo primary peritoneal drainage or laparotomy with bowel resection. Postoperative care was standardized. The primary outcome was survival at 90 days postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included dependence on parenteral nutrition 90 days postoperatively and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

At 90 days postoperatively, 19 of 55 infants assigned to primary peritoneal drainage had died (34.5 percent), as compared with 22 of 62 infants assigned to laparotomy (35.5 percent, P=0.92). The percentages of infants who depended on total parenteral nutrition were 17 of 36 (47.2 percent) in the peritoneal-drainage group and 16 of 40 (40.0 percent) in the laparotomy group (P=0.53). The mean (+/-SD) length of hospitalization for the 76 infants who were alive 90 days after operation was similar in the primary peritoneal-drainage and laparotomy groups (126+/-58 days and 116+/-56 days, respectively; P=0.43). Subgroup analyses stratified according to the presence or absence of radiographic evidence of extensive necrotizing enterocolitis (pneumatosis intestinalis), gestational age of less than 25 weeks, and serum pH less than 7.30 at presentation showed no significant advantage of either treatment in any group.

CONCLUSIONS

The type of operation performed for perforated necrotizing enterocolitis does not influence survival or other clinically important early outcomes in preterm infants. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00252681.).

Для цитирования: Moss R Lawrence, Dimmitt Reed A, Barnhart Douglas C, Sylvester Karl G, Brown Rebeccah L, Powell David M, Islam Saleem, Langer Jacob C, Sato Thomas T, Brandt Mary L, Lee Hanmin, Blakely Martin L, Lazar Eric L, Hirschl Ronald B, Kenney Brian D, Hackam David J, Zelterman Daniel, Silverman Bonnie L. Laparotomy versus peritoneal drainage for necrotizing enterocolitis and perforation.. The New England journal of medicine. 2006. DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa054605.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.