Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction · 2026
Consensus-based management of endometriosis-associated pelvic pain: Results of a French Delphi study.
СтатьяКлинические рекомендацииНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Levesque Amélie, Fauconnier Arnaud, Brillac Thierry, Bailleul Alexandre, Acapo Sessi, Bautrant Éric, Calvarin Estelle, Canis Michel, Chalut-Natal Christine, Cornillet-Bernard Martine, Garcia Émilie, Lacoste Chloé, Ponomareva Anna, Sabaté Jean-Marc, Saracco Priscilla, Suc Agnès, Tyson Sophie, Chabbert-Buffet Nathalie, Fritel Xavier
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To develop best practice guidelines under the auspices of the CNGOF (National college of French Gynaecologist Obstetrician) and Convergences PP (Convergences in Pelviperineal Pain) for the management of endometriosis-associated pelvic pain.
METHOD: We organised a literature review and a formal group consensus. A multidisciplinary steering committee composed of 14 healthcare professionals and 2 patients association representatives drafted an argument based on literature analysis, resulting in 7 proposed definitions and 59 best practice recommendations. These proposals were then submitted for review by 108 French healthcare professionals from various specialties and professions. The first two rounds of rating were conducted online between June 2024 and November 2024, followed by a final videoconference meeting in January 2025.
RESULTS: The participation rate was 68% in the first round (74/108) and 76% in the second round (56/74). In total, 3 definitions and 45 best practice recommendations were retained and distributed across 6 sections: 1) Definition; 2) Assessment of chronic pelvic pain associated with endometriosis; 3) Non-pharmacological management; 4) Pharmacological management; 5) Surgical management; 6) Communication, health education, and therapeutic education.
CONCLUSION: This formal consensus process has enabled the development of definitions and best practice guidelines to assist healthcare professionals in managing patients suffering from pain associated with endometriosis, thereby promoting better screening, characterization of pain, and therapeutic management.
METHOD: We organised a literature review and a formal group consensus. A multidisciplinary steering committee composed of 14 healthcare professionals and 2 patients association representatives drafted an argument based on literature analysis, resulting in 7 proposed definitions and 59 best practice recommendations. These proposals were then submitted for review by 108 French healthcare professionals from various specialties and professions. The first two rounds of rating were conducted online between June 2024 and November 2024, followed by a final videoconference meeting in January 2025.
RESULTS: The participation rate was 68% in the first round (74/108) and 76% in the second round (56/74). In total, 3 definitions and 45 best practice recommendations were retained and distributed across 6 sections: 1) Definition; 2) Assessment of chronic pelvic pain associated with endometriosis; 3) Non-pharmacological management; 4) Pharmacological management; 5) Surgical management; 6) Communication, health education, and therapeutic education.
CONCLUSION: This formal consensus process has enabled the development of definitions and best practice guidelines to assist healthcare professionals in managing patients suffering from pain associated with endometriosis, thereby promoting better screening, characterization of pain, and therapeutic management.