Journal of orthopaedic surgery (Hong Kong) · 2023
Olecranon fractures: A biomechanical comparison of three tension band wiring fixation methods on bone models.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Calisal Emre, Uğur Levent
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the biomechanical pull-out strength of the three different tension band wiring (TBW) methods employed to fix transverse olecranon fractures on bone models.
METHODS: Three different fixation models were created in groups of seven synthetic olecranon fractured bone models. The first technique was fixed the olecranon with the traditional TBW method. The second technique was fixed the olecranon with a large intramedullary screw TBW method. The third technique was fixed the olecranon with the double-screw TBW method. The pull-out force needed for the failure of each specimen under the tensile test device was evaluated, and the results were recorded.
RESULTS: We found that the lowest average pull out strength was 55.10 N (range: 35.87-65.85 ± 10.17) in the traditional TBW method, the highest pull out strength was 84.28 N (range: 63.67-117 ± 18.87) in the double-screw TBW method. The pull out strength was 70.80 N (range: 52.60-80.95 ± 10.18) in the intramedullary screw TBW method. In terms of ultimate failure loads, there was no significant difference between the intramedullary screw TBW and the double-screw TBW (p > .05) while there was a significant difference between the traditional TBW and the other two methods (p < .05).
CONCLUSION: The use of screw(s) shows higher biomechanical stability than K-wires in the TBW method. Double-screws fixation gives similar results in terms of the biomechanical load to failure compared to a large intramedullary screw fixation. Both screw methods can be used as stable constructs in clinical practice.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, biomechanical trial.
METHODS: Three different fixation models were created in groups of seven synthetic olecranon fractured bone models. The first technique was fixed the olecranon with the traditional TBW method. The second technique was fixed the olecranon with a large intramedullary screw TBW method. The third technique was fixed the olecranon with the double-screw TBW method. The pull-out force needed for the failure of each specimen under the tensile test device was evaluated, and the results were recorded.
RESULTS: We found that the lowest average pull out strength was 55.10 N (range: 35.87-65.85 ± 10.17) in the traditional TBW method, the highest pull out strength was 84.28 N (range: 63.67-117 ± 18.87) in the double-screw TBW method. The pull out strength was 70.80 N (range: 52.60-80.95 ± 10.18) in the intramedullary screw TBW method. In terms of ultimate failure loads, there was no significant difference between the intramedullary screw TBW and the double-screw TBW (p > .05) while there was a significant difference between the traditional TBW and the other two methods (p < .05).
CONCLUSION: The use of screw(s) shows higher biomechanical stability than K-wires in the TBW method. Double-screws fixation gives similar results in terms of the biomechanical load to failure compared to a large intramedullary screw fixation. Both screw methods can be used as stable constructs in clinical practice.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, biomechanical trial.