Cancer epidemiology · 2015
Random biopsy in colposcopy-negative quadrant is not effective in women with positive colposcopy in practice.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Song Yan, Zhao Yu-Qian, Zhang Xun, Liu Xiao-Yang, Li Ling, Pan Qin-Jing, Shen Gui-Hua, Zhao Fang-Hui, Chen Feng, Chen Wen, Qiao You-Lin
Аннотация
AIM: To assess the efficacy of random biopsy in diagnosing those high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions or carcinomas (HSIL+) missed by colposcopy-directed biopsy, and to identify the scenarios of cervical cancer screening when random biopsy is necessary.
PATIENTS/INTERVENTIONS: Data from 1997 women who participated in the Shanxi Province Cervical Cancer Screening Study I (SPOCCS I) were reviewed. Each woman received human papillomavirus (HPV) testing with the second-generation hybrid capture, liquid-based cytology, four-quadrant biopsy and endocervical curettage. The final diagnosis was based on the most severe pathological result obtained. The efficacy of random biopsy and colposcopy-directed biopsy was evaluated on the basis of the final pathological results.
RESULTS: For women with severe cytological abnormalities (HSIL+) and negative colposcopy, the yield of HSIL+ diagnosed by random biopsy was 25%. On the other hand, the yield of HSIL+ diagnosed by random biopsies in the negative quadrant was no more than 4% when the colposcopy was positive, regardless of the cytological findings. For women with negative HPV, no HSIL+ was found by random biopsy. For women with severe cytological abnormalities (HSIL+) and positive HPV, the yield of HSIL+ diagnosed by random biopsy was 35% when colposcopy was negative. For women with low-grade intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) and positive HPV, the yield of HSIL+ diagnosed by random biopsy was 12.5% when colposcopy was negative.
CONCLUSION: Random biopsy is not effective in the negative quadrant in women with positive colposcopy, but should be performed in women with cytological HSIL+ but negative colposcopy, or in those with cytological LSIL or HGSL+ and positive HPV but negative colposcopy.
PATIENTS/INTERVENTIONS: Data from 1997 women who participated in the Shanxi Province Cervical Cancer Screening Study I (SPOCCS I) were reviewed. Each woman received human papillomavirus (HPV) testing with the second-generation hybrid capture, liquid-based cytology, four-quadrant biopsy and endocervical curettage. The final diagnosis was based on the most severe pathological result obtained. The efficacy of random biopsy and colposcopy-directed biopsy was evaluated on the basis of the final pathological results.
RESULTS: For women with severe cytological abnormalities (HSIL+) and negative colposcopy, the yield of HSIL+ diagnosed by random biopsy was 25%. On the other hand, the yield of HSIL+ diagnosed by random biopsies in the negative quadrant was no more than 4% when the colposcopy was positive, regardless of the cytological findings. For women with negative HPV, no HSIL+ was found by random biopsy. For women with severe cytological abnormalities (HSIL+) and positive HPV, the yield of HSIL+ diagnosed by random biopsy was 35% when colposcopy was negative. For women with low-grade intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) and positive HPV, the yield of HSIL+ diagnosed by random biopsy was 12.5% when colposcopy was negative.
CONCLUSION: Random biopsy is not effective in the negative quadrant in women with positive colposcopy, but should be performed in women with cytological HSIL+ but negative colposcopy, or in those with cytological LSIL or HGSL+ and positive HPV but negative colposcopy.