MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ctarc.2026.101319

Медицинская библиотека · Cancer treatment and research communications · 2026

Fumarate hydratase-deficient renal cell carcinoma - results of the exploratory analysis in the SUNNIFORECAST trial comparing Ipilimumab plus Nivolumab vs standard of care as first line treatment.

Ahrens Marit, Haanen John, Albiges Laurence, Goupil Marine Gross, Boleti Ekaterini, Gravis Gwenaelle, Fléchon Aude, Grimm Marc Oliver, Bedke Jens, Barthélémy Philippe, Castellano Daniel, Mellado Begona, Ivanyi Philipp, Rottey Sylvie, Flörcken Anne, Suárez Cristina, Maroto Jose P, Grünwald Viktor, Oosting Sjoukje, Kopecky Jindrich, Zschäbitz Stefanie, Boegemann Martin, Buchler Tomas, Niegisch Guenter, Goebell Peter J, Waddell Tom, Joly Florence, Priou Frank, Retz Margitta, Siemer Stefan, Zimmermann Uwe, Deckbar Dorothee, Burkholder Iris, Stöhr Christine, Hartmann Arndt, Bergmann Lothar, Interdisciplinary Renal Cell Carcinoma Working Group of the DKG (IAGN)

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Fumarate hydratase (FH)-deficient renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a rare, molecularly defined subgroup of non-clear cell RCC (nccRCC) lacking an approved standard treatment. We report the exploratory analysis of this entity within the SUNNIFORECAST trial.

METHODS

SUNNIFORECAST evaluated ipilimumab/nivolumab versus standard of care (SOC) in previously untreated, advanced nccRCC. The primary endpoint was the 12-months overall survival (OS) rate. Secondary endpoints included median OS, progression free survival (PFS) and overall response rate (ORR). PD-L1 expression was assessed exploratorily.

RESULTS

Of 309 randomized patients, 30 had centrally confirmed FH-deficient RCC (ipilimumab/nivolumab, n=14; SOC, n= 16). The 12-months OS rate was 85.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 53.9-96.2%) versus 73.3% (95% CI 43.6-89.1%), median OS was 35.7 months (95% CI 16.8 months-NE) versus 24.7 months (95% CI 10.6-37.7 months, hazard ratio [HR] 0.46 [0.17-1.20]), and ORR 42.9% versus 33.3%, favoring ipilimumab/nivolumab. Twenty-four patients were evaluable for PD-L1 expression; 21 had a combined positive score (CPS) ≥1. In this subgroup, the 12-months OS rate was 80.0% (95% CI 40.9-94.6%) versus 72.7% (95% CI 37.1-90.3%), median OS 38.3 months (95% CI 8.8 months-NE) versus 24.7 months (95% CI 8.8 months-NE, HR 0.43 [0.14-1.34]) and ORR 40.0% versus 36.4% for ipilimumab/nivolumab versus SOC, respectively.

INTERPRETATION / DISCUSSION: Exploratory analyses suggest trends toward improved 12-months OS-rate, median OS and ORR with ipilimumab/nivolumab versus SOC in FH-deficient RCC. The majority of tumors demonstrated PD-L1-expression (e.g. CPS ≥ 1), warranting further investigation in prospective studies.

Для цитирования: Ahrens Marit, Haanen John, Albiges Laurence, Goupil Marine Gross, Boleti Ekaterini, Gravis Gwenaelle, Fléchon Aude, Grimm Marc Oliver, Bedke Jens, Barthélémy Philippe, Castellano Daniel, Mellado Begona, Ivanyi Philipp, Rottey Sylvie, Flörcken Anne, Suárez Cristina, Maroto Jose P, Grünwald Viktor, Oosting Sjoukje, Kopecky Jindrich, Zschäbitz Stefanie, Boegemann Martin, Buchler Tomas, Niegisch Guenter, Goebell Peter J, Waddell Tom, Joly Florence, Priou Frank, Retz Margitta, Siemer Stefan, Zimmermann Uwe, Deckbar Dorothee, Burkholder Iris, Stöhr Christine, Hartmann Arndt, Bergmann Lothar, Interdisciplinary Renal Cell Carcinoma Working Group of the DKG (IAGN). Fumarate hydratase-deficient renal cell carcinoma - results of the exploratory analysis in the SUNNIFORECAST trial comparing Ipilimumab plus Nivolumab vs standard of care as first line treatment.. Cancer treatment and research communications. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2026.101319.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.