American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM · 2022
Cervical cerclage training: Development and assessment of a simulator.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hall Megan, Suff Natalie, Stirrat Laura, Coary Carrie, Abernethy Jessie, Debray Raphaelle, Tydeman Graham, Shennan Andrew
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Cervical cerclage is a mainstay intervention for the prevention of spontaneous preterm birth in high-risk women. Simulation training facilitates high-level skill transfer in a low-consequence environment, and is being integrated into obstetrics and gynecology training.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop a simulator for cervical cerclage, determine its validity as a simulator, and identify parameters suitable as proxy markers for performance.
STUDY DESIGN: The 3 aims of this study were achieved, namely: (1) simulator design by obstetricians and a commercial company; (2) survey of obstetricians and gynecologists across a variety of training stages to determine need for and opinion of the simulator; and (3) comparison of novice and expert groups across a variety of proxy markers for successful cerclage insertion.
RESULTS: Obstetricians and gynecologists found the simulator to be similar to clinical scenarios and suitable for skill training. Novice participants stated that the use of the simulator improved their confidence (P=.016). In a comparison between 6 expert and 8 novice surgeons, there seemed to be variations across multiple measurements of cerclage placement.
CONCLUSION: Simulation is an increasingly prominent training modality for surgical skills. The simulator described herein was considered suitable for training by obstetricians and gynecologists. Further work should focus on the validations of proxy markers of successful insertion, longitudinal assessment of trainees, and correlation of training outcomes with clinical outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop a simulator for cervical cerclage, determine its validity as a simulator, and identify parameters suitable as proxy markers for performance.
STUDY DESIGN: The 3 aims of this study were achieved, namely: (1) simulator design by obstetricians and a commercial company; (2) survey of obstetricians and gynecologists across a variety of training stages to determine need for and opinion of the simulator; and (3) comparison of novice and expert groups across a variety of proxy markers for successful cerclage insertion.
RESULTS: Obstetricians and gynecologists found the simulator to be similar to clinical scenarios and suitable for skill training. Novice participants stated that the use of the simulator improved their confidence (P=.016). In a comparison between 6 expert and 8 novice surgeons, there seemed to be variations across multiple measurements of cerclage placement.
CONCLUSION: Simulation is an increasingly prominent training modality for surgical skills. The simulator described herein was considered suitable for training by obstetricians and gynecologists. Further work should focus on the validations of proxy markers of successful insertion, longitudinal assessment of trainees, and correlation of training outcomes with clinical outcomes.