Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR · 2022
Factors Contributing to Successful Transvenous Retrograde Thoracic Duct Cannulation.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kim Hyeongchun, Hyun Dongho, Shin Sung Wook, Jeong Guseong, Kim Jungon, Cho Jong Ho, Lee Ho Yun, Jang Yunjeong
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To identify key factors for successful transvenous retrograde cannulation (TVRC) of the thoracic duct.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 47 consecutive patients (62.1 ± 13.2 years; 32 men) who underwent attempted TVRC between July 2016 and July 2021 were included. Reasons for interventions were chylous leakage from the chest (n = 36), abdomen (n = 6), and other sites (n = 5). Patient age, sex, access vein (femoral vs brachial), anatomic classification (presence of dominant channel vs plexiform) of the terminal thoracic duct, and engagement of a diagnostic catheter into the jugulovenous junction were included in the analyses. Anatomic details were evaluated according to catheter-based high-pressure lymphangiography and conventional intranodal lymphangiography. The Firth bias-reduced penalized-likelihood logistic regression model was used to analyze prognostic factors.
RESULTS: TVRC was successful in 33 of the 47 patients (70%). In univariate analysis, femoral access, diagnostic catheter engagement, and presence of dominant channel were significant positive prognostic factors (P <.05). In multivariate analysis, diagnostic catheter engagement and presence of dominant channel were significant prognostic factors (P <.05). Diagnostic catheter engagement showed the highest prognostic performance (accuracy = 0.872), followed by presence of a dominant channel. High-pressure catheter-based lymphangiographic findings showed better performance (accuracy, 0.844 vs 0.727) than intranodal lymphangiography to delineate the anatomy of the terminal thoracic duct.
CONCLUSIONS: A secure selection of the jugulovenous junction and the presence of a dominant channel in the terminal portion of the thoracic duct were significant prognostic factors for successful TVRC.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 47 consecutive patients (62.1 ± 13.2 years; 32 men) who underwent attempted TVRC between July 2016 and July 2021 were included. Reasons for interventions were chylous leakage from the chest (n = 36), abdomen (n = 6), and other sites (n = 5). Patient age, sex, access vein (femoral vs brachial), anatomic classification (presence of dominant channel vs plexiform) of the terminal thoracic duct, and engagement of a diagnostic catheter into the jugulovenous junction were included in the analyses. Anatomic details were evaluated according to catheter-based high-pressure lymphangiography and conventional intranodal lymphangiography. The Firth bias-reduced penalized-likelihood logistic regression model was used to analyze prognostic factors.
RESULTS: TVRC was successful in 33 of the 47 patients (70%). In univariate analysis, femoral access, diagnostic catheter engagement, and presence of dominant channel were significant positive prognostic factors (P <.05). In multivariate analysis, diagnostic catheter engagement and presence of dominant channel were significant prognostic factors (P <.05). Diagnostic catheter engagement showed the highest prognostic performance (accuracy = 0.872), followed by presence of a dominant channel. High-pressure catheter-based lymphangiographic findings showed better performance (accuracy, 0.844 vs 0.727) than intranodal lymphangiography to delineate the anatomy of the terminal thoracic duct.
CONCLUSIONS: A secure selection of the jugulovenous junction and the presence of a dominant channel in the terminal portion of the thoracic duct were significant prognostic factors for successful TVRC.