Epidemiological analysis of the facial fractures pattern in relation to motorcycle helmet type: A retrospective study on 282 patients.

Most maxillofacial traumas are caused by road traffic collisions and, in particular, by motorcycle accidents. Helmets represent an efficient protective tool in these traumas but they do not provide complete protection. The aim of this study was to perform an epidemiological analysis of facial fractures pattern in relation to the helmet type worn during the accident. The study was a retrospective analysis of 282 patients with a diagnosis of maxillofacial fracture caused by a motorcycle accident. The patients were divided in three groups based on helmet type (Group A: full-face helmet; Group B: modular [half-face] helmet; Group C: open-face helmet). For each group, fractures type and trauma severity, using the Comprehensive Facial Injury (CFI) scale, were recorded. Results showed that isolated midface fractures were strongly related to full-face helmet wearing (p < 0.001), while mandibular fractures and panfacial trauma/combined fractures were negatively correlated (p < 0.001). Mandibular fractures (p < 0.001) and panfacial trauma/combined fractures (p < 0.001) were strongly related to open helmet. Moreover, severe trauma (CFI 8.16) was recorded for open-face helmet wearing. In conclusion, full-face helmet wearing reduced the risk of facial fracture, in particular panfacial trauma/combined fractures, while open-face helmet wearing increased the risk of these fractures.