MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.acuroe.2024.05.001

Медицинская библиотека · Actas urologicas espanolas · 2024

What is the relationship between penile cancer and the microbiome? A scoping review.

García-Perdomo H A, Granados-Duque V, Spiess P E

СтатьяScoping ReviewПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

The microbiota is defined as the microorganisms in a particular environment. Conversely, the term microbiome is less firmly defined and is used to reference the habitat.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the association between the microbiome and the penile cancer EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We performed this scoping review according to the recommendations of the Joanna Briggs Institute. We found five articles that fulfilled the inclusion criteria. We focused on oncogenesis and factors that alter the penile microbiome. We were not limited to language or setting. We searched MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and LILACS from inception to the present day.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: We found nine studies describing multiple factors that could disturb the microbiome, such as sexual behavior, anatomic alterations including circumcision, and inflammatory factors: lichen sclerosus, poor genital hygiene, compromised immune system, smoking, and HPV infection.

CONCLUSION

Overall, knowledge of the composition of the penile microbiota and its role in penile cancer oncogenesis is minimal.

PATIENT SUMMARY: Future studies should focus on the relationship between the microbiome and penile cancer to broaden this field of knowledge.

Для цитирования: García-Perdomo H A, Granados-Duque V, Spiess P E. What is the relationship between penile cancer and the microbiome? A scoping review.. Actas urologicas espanolas. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2024.05.001.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.