The British journal of ophthalmology · 2019
Classifying juvenile onset primary open angle glaucoma using cluster analysis.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Birla Shweta, Gupta Dinesh, Somarajan Bindu I, Gupta Shikha, Chaurasia Abadh Kishore, Kishan Azmira, Gupta Viney
Аннотация
AIM: To classify unrelated patients with juvenile onset primary open angle glaucoma (JOAG) into clinically useful phenotypes using cluster analysis.
METHODS: Out of the 527 unrelated patients with JOAG, the study included 414 patients who had all the phenotypic characteristics required for the study. A cluster analysis was performed to classify the patients based on their iris and angle morphology, age of onset, highest untreated intraocular pressure (IOP), worst mean deviation and greatest vertical cup disc ratio of the worst eye. The iris features were broadly classified into three groups: those with normal iris crypts (NIC), those with prominent iris crypts (PIC) and those with absence of iris crypts. The gonio photographs were graded as normal appearing angle or those with angle dysgenesis in the form of a featureless angle, one with a high iris insertion and an angle with prominent iris processes. Using a hierarchical clustering model and a two-way cluster analysis, the distribution of clusters of JOAG was analysed to obtain a classification of JOAG subtypes.
RESULTS: The four major clusters identified were: Cluster 1 with NIC and normal angles had the lowest untreated IOP and higher age of onset among all clusters. Cluster 2 with NIC and featureless angle was found to be associated with earliest age of onset. Cluster 3 had NIC and either a high iris insertion or prominent iris processes. Cluster 4 was a heterogeneous cluster with maximum number of patients in a group comprising of those with PIC and high iris insertion.
CONCLUSIONS: Cluster analysis extracted four subgroups of the JOAG phenotype that have clinical and prognostic significance and can potentially be helpful while evaluating these patients in the clinics.
METHODS: Out of the 527 unrelated patients with JOAG, the study included 414 patients who had all the phenotypic characteristics required for the study. A cluster analysis was performed to classify the patients based on their iris and angle morphology, age of onset, highest untreated intraocular pressure (IOP), worst mean deviation and greatest vertical cup disc ratio of the worst eye. The iris features were broadly classified into three groups: those with normal iris crypts (NIC), those with prominent iris crypts (PIC) and those with absence of iris crypts. The gonio photographs were graded as normal appearing angle or those with angle dysgenesis in the form of a featureless angle, one with a high iris insertion and an angle with prominent iris processes. Using a hierarchical clustering model and a two-way cluster analysis, the distribution of clusters of JOAG was analysed to obtain a classification of JOAG subtypes.
RESULTS: The four major clusters identified were: Cluster 1 with NIC and normal angles had the lowest untreated IOP and higher age of onset among all clusters. Cluster 2 with NIC and featureless angle was found to be associated with earliest age of onset. Cluster 3 had NIC and either a high iris insertion or prominent iris processes. Cluster 4 was a heterogeneous cluster with maximum number of patients in a group comprising of those with PIC and high iris insertion.
CONCLUSIONS: Cluster analysis extracted four subgroups of the JOAG phenotype that have clinical and prognostic significance and can potentially be helpful while evaluating these patients in the clinics.