MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/070674379804300910

Медицинская библиотека · Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 1998

Therapy for vaginismus: in vivo versus in vitro desensitization.

Schnyder U, Schnyder-Lüthi C, Ballinari P, Blaser A

Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To verify the effectiveness of desensitization exercises with dilators in the treatment of vaginismus, while comparing 2 therapeutic variations with differing instruction procedures ("in vivo" versus "in vitro") during the desensitization exercises.

METHOD: A consecutive random sample of 44 female outpatients in sexual therapy were divided into groups for either treatment on a random basis. All patients were treated until the symptoms abated on the basis of a structured therapy program. The stability of the therapeutic success was verified through follow-up interviews.

RESULTS

Forty-three (97.2%) of the patients were able to have sexual intercourse after an average of 6.3 therapeutic sessions. One-third reported an increase in their sexual desire. Thirty-four of 39 patients (87.2%) would be prepared to repeat the therapy. There were no significant differences in the success and the required number of consultations for the cure between the 2 groups investigated.

CONCLUSIONS

Desensitization through exercises with dilators is an effective method for treating vaginismus. The choice of instruction procedure can be left to the patient.

Для цитирования: Schnyder U, Schnyder-Lüthi C, Ballinari P, Blaser A. Therapy for vaginismus: in vivo versus in vitro desensitization.. Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie. 1998. DOI: 10.1177/070674379804300910.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.