MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/ca.20665

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.) · 2008

Soft tissue anatomy around the hip and its implications for choice of entry point in antegrade femoral nailing.

Ansari Moein C M, Verhofstad M H J, Bleys R L A W, van der Werken Chr

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Antegrade intramedullary nailing is an accepted method of treatment for femoral shaft fractures. Entrance of the nail through the trochanteric fossa is currently recommended by some surgeons. This approach results in some cases, however, in loss of abduction strength and persistent pain. Nail insertion at the tip of the greater trochanter may be more favorable. In this study the anatomical relationships of the trochanteric fossa and of the tip of the greater trochanter were explored. Dissection was carried out in 10 fresh human cadaver femurs. The risks and safety of the two entry points with respect to the adjacent soft tissues were assessed. Abductor muscles and tendons, branches of the medial circumflex femoral artery and the hip joint capsule were at risk during nail insertion through the trochanteric fossa. These structures were not endangered during insertion through the trochanteric tip. The reported clinical morbidity after nailing through the trochanteric fossa may result from direct soft tissue injury and may be reduced by choosing the route through the greater trochanter.

Для цитирования: Ansari Moein C M, Verhofstad M H J, Bleys R L A W, van der Werken Chr. Soft tissue anatomy around the hip and its implications for choice of entry point in antegrade femoral nailing.. Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.). 2008. DOI: 10.1002/ca.20665.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.