MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1128/iai.32.2.518-524.1981

Медицинская библиотека · Infection and immunity · 1981

Comparative virulence of Haemophilus influenzae with a type b or type d capsule.

Roberts M, Stull T L, Smith A L

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

To determine the importance of specific capsule type in the pathogenesis of invasive Haemophilus influenzae disease, we compared the virulence of type b and type d strains isolated from different children with the virulence of transformation-derived type b and type d organisms. In addition, the unencapsulated derivative of these strains was also examined. Virulence was assessed by determining the ability of the strains to produce bacteremia with intranasal or subcutaneous inoculation. Unencapsulated derivatives were unable to cause bacteremia by any route; all type b strains (whether natural or derived by transformation), a natural type d, and a type d derived by transformation were able to produce bacteremia with similar frequency (42 to 62%) when 10(7) colony-forming units was given intranasally. Subcutaneous inoculation of 10(3) colony-forming units of strains with the type b capsule produced bacteremia at a greater frequency than did the strains with the type d capsule (P less than 0.002). The type d isolate was more virulent than a mutagenized derivative of the strain. We conclude that the type b strains are more virulent than type d when inoculated subcutaneously.

Для цитирования: Roberts M, Stull T L, Smith A L. Comparative virulence of Haemophilus influenzae with a type b or type d capsule.. Infection and immunity. 1981. DOI: 10.1128/iai.32.2.518-524.1981.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.