MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017235

Медицинская библиотека · BMJ open · 2017

Hughes Abdominal Repair Trial (HART)-abdominal wall closure techniques to reduce the incidence of incisional hernias: feasibility trial for a multicentre, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial.

Harries Rhiannon L, Cornish Julie, Bosanquet David, Rees Buddug, Horwood James, Islam Saiful, Bashir Nadim, Watkins Alan, Russell Ian T, Torkington Jared, HART Trial Management Group

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеPragmatic Clinical TrialПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

Incisional hernias are common complications of midline abdominal closure. The 'Hughes Repair' combines a standard mass closure with a series of horizontal and two vertical mattress sutures within a single suture. There is evidence to suggest this technique is as effective as mesh repair for the operative management of incisional hernias; however, no trials have compared Hughes repair with standard mass closure for the prevention of incisional hernia formation. This paper aims to test the feasibility of running a randomised controlled trial of a comparison of abdominal wall closure methods following midline incisional surgery for colorectal cancer, in preparation to a definitive randomised controlled trial.

DESIGN AND

SETTING

A feasibility trial (with 1:1 randomisation) conducted perioperatively during colorectal cancer surgery.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients undergoing midline incisional surgery for resection of colorectal cancer.

INTERVENTIONS: Comparison of two suture techniques (Hughes repair or standard mass closure) for the closure of the midline abdominal wound following surgery for colorectal cancer.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: A 30-patient feasibility trial assessed recruitment, randomisation, deliverability and early safety of the surgical techniques used.

RESULTS

A total of 30 patients were randomised from 43 patients recruited and consented, over a 5-month period. 14 and 16 patients were randomised to arms A and B, respectively. There was one superficial surgical site infection (SSI) and two organ space SSIs reported in arm A, and two superficial SSIs and one complete wound dehiscence in arm B. There were no suspected unexpected serious adverse reactions reported in either arm. Independent data monitoring committee found no early safety concerns.

CONCLUSIONS

The feasibility trial found no early safety concerns and demonstrated that the trial was acceptable to patients. Progression to the pilot and main phases of the trial has now commenced following approval by the independent data monitoring committee.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN 25616490.

Для цитирования: Harries Rhiannon L, Cornish Julie, Bosanquet David, Rees Buddug, Horwood James, Islam Saiful, Bashir Nadim, Watkins Alan, Russell Ian T, Torkington Jared, HART Trial Management Group. Hughes Abdominal Repair Trial (HART)-abdominal wall closure techniques to reduce the incidence of incisional hernias: feasibility trial for a multicentre, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial.. BMJ open. 2017. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017235.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.