Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2026
MicrotiaGPT: Appraisal of Microtia Care Recommendations From an Artificially Intelligent Chatbot.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ayo-Ajibola Oluwatobiloba, Park Simon, Osterbauer Beth, Kallemeyn Krystina, Gomez Gabriel
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the accuracy, comprehensiveness, and similarity to provider response of ChatGPT-4o in providing patient education regarding microtia and aural atresia management.
METHODS: Ten standardized inquiries were created across three domains (General Information, Hearing/Anatomy, Treatment Decision-Making) and entered into ChatGPT-4o. Responses were evaluated by an international multidisciplinary cohort of 23 experts, including pediatric otolaryngologists and audiologists. Using 5-point Likert scales, graders assessed factual accuracy, comprehensiveness, similarity to physician responses, and overall quality. Readability was analyzed using Flesch-Kincaid metrics.
RESULTS: ChatGPT-generated responses demonstrated high accuracy (mean = 4.03 [SD = 0.66]), comprehensiveness (mean = 4.18 [SD = 0.54]), and similarity to the provider's response (4.02 [0.70]). Audiologists assigned significantly lower ratings than pediatric otolaryngologists regarding accuracy (mean = 3.76 vs. 4.13; p < 0.001) and comprehensiveness (3.94 vs. 4.30; p = 0.046). Qualitative analysis included concerns regarding advanced terminology, omission of specific risks, and a lack of empathetic framing regarding parental guilt. Flesch-Kincaid Reading Grade Level often exceeded the 5th-grade average level for patient education materials (mean = 9.64 [SD = 1.21]).
CONCLUSION: ChatGPT-4o provides reliable introductory information but lacks the technical nuance and multidisciplinary coordination essential for complex microtia care. While a useful adjunct for early information-seeking, ChatGPT-4o lacks the multidisciplinary framing and depth required for ideal counseling.
METHODS: Ten standardized inquiries were created across three domains (General Information, Hearing/Anatomy, Treatment Decision-Making) and entered into ChatGPT-4o. Responses were evaluated by an international multidisciplinary cohort of 23 experts, including pediatric otolaryngologists and audiologists. Using 5-point Likert scales, graders assessed factual accuracy, comprehensiveness, similarity to physician responses, and overall quality. Readability was analyzed using Flesch-Kincaid metrics.
RESULTS: ChatGPT-generated responses demonstrated high accuracy (mean = 4.03 [SD = 0.66]), comprehensiveness (mean = 4.18 [SD = 0.54]), and similarity to the provider's response (4.02 [0.70]). Audiologists assigned significantly lower ratings than pediatric otolaryngologists regarding accuracy (mean = 3.76 vs. 4.13; p < 0.001) and comprehensiveness (3.94 vs. 4.30; p = 0.046). Qualitative analysis included concerns regarding advanced terminology, omission of specific risks, and a lack of empathetic framing regarding parental guilt. Flesch-Kincaid Reading Grade Level often exceeded the 5th-grade average level for patient education materials (mean = 9.64 [SD = 1.21]).
CONCLUSION: ChatGPT-4o provides reliable introductory information but lacks the technical nuance and multidisciplinary coordination essential for complex microtia care. While a useful adjunct for early information-seeking, ChatGPT-4o lacks the multidisciplinary framing and depth required for ideal counseling.