Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2015
Current challenges in diagnostic imaging of venous thromboembolism.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Huisman Menno V, Klok Frederikus A
Аннотация
Because the clinical diagnosis of deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism is nonspecific, integrated diagnostic approaches for patients with suspected venous thromboembolism have been developed over the years, involving both non-invasive bedside tools (clinical decision rules and D-dimer blood tests) for patients with low pretest probability and diagnostic techniques (compression ultrasound for deep-vein thrombosis and computed tomography pulmonary angiography for pulmonary embolism) for those with a high pretest probability. This combination has led to standardized diagnostic algorithms with proven safety for excluding venous thrombotic disease. At the same time, it has become apparent that, as a result of the natural history of venous thrombosis, there are special patient populations in which the current standard diagnostic algorithms are not sufficient. In this review, we present 3 evidence-based patient cases to underline recent developments in the imaging diagnosis of venous thromboembolism.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsDecision Support Systems, ClinicalDiagnostic ImagingEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleFibrin Fibrinogen Degradation ProductsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPerfusionPregnancyProbabilityPulmonary EmbolismRecurrenceRenal InsufficiencyTomography, X-Ray ComputedUltrasonographyVenous ThromboembolismVenous Thrombosis