DOI 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2025.117186
False-positive results of the turbidimetric β-D-glucan assay in patients with bacteremia.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
The presence of bacteremia is described as a cause of false-positive (FP) elevation of serum (1→3)-β-D-glucan (BDG) levels measured with the Fungitell colorimetric assay. The experience with the increasingly used turbidimetric Wako BDG assay in this scenario is limited.
METHODS
We recruited 58 patients with proven bacteremia and no clinical suspicion of invasive fungal disease between October 2022 and July 2023. Serum BDG was assessed by the Wako test in blood samples collected immediately upon the confirmation of blood culture positivity (median interval of 3 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 2 - 5)). The positivity threshold was set at 7 pg/mL as per manufacturer's instructions.
RESULTS
The most common sources of bacteremia were urinary tract infection (27.6%) and intraabdominal or hepatobiliary infection (24.1%). Predominant pathogens included Staphylococcus aureus (44.1%), Escherichia coli (22.0%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (15.5%). Most of the patients (91.4%) received a β-lactam-containing regimen. A positive BDG assay was obtained in 5 patients, yielding a FP rate of 8.6% (95% confidence interval: 2.9 - 18.9). The median BDG was 8.6 pg/mL (IQR: 7-9 - 12.4). All but one patient had at least one alternative cause of FP results in the BDG assay, including hemodialysis, colitis, albumin therapy and gauze exposure. One patient with persistently elevated BDG levels was eventually diagnosed with Candida esophagitis.
CONCLUSIONS
The occurrence of FP results with the turbidimetric BDG assay is uncommon, involves moderate reactivity and is typically accompanied by other potential causes of serum BDG elevation.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.