Bulletin of the Hospital for Joint Disease (2013) · 2023
Outcomes for Patients With Developmental Hip Dysplasia Who Present After Six Months of Age.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Roiz Ronald, Harris Liam R, Goldstein Rachel Y
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Late presentation of hip dysplasia persists despite robust screening methods. After 6 months of age, treatment with a hip abduction orthosis becomes challeng-ing, and all other treatment modalities have higher reported rates of complications.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all patients from 2003 to 2012 who had the sole diagnosis of de-velopmental hip dysplasia, who presented before 18 months of age, and who had at least 2 years of follow-up. The cohort was then grouped based on their presentation before (BSM) or after (ASM) 6 months of age. The groups were compared for demographics, exam findings, and outcomes.
RESULTS: We identified 36 patients with presentation after 6 months and 63 patients who presented before 6 months. Hav-ing a normal newborn hip exam and unilateral involvement were risk factors for late presentation (p < 0.001). Only 6% (2/36) patients in the ASM group were successfully treated non-operatively; the ASM group underwent an average of 1.33 procedures. The odds of utilizing an open reduction for the primary procedure for the late presenting patient was 4.91 times higher than the early presenting group (p = 0.001). Limited hip range of motion, particularly hip external rotation, was the only significantly different out-come (p = 0.03). There was no significance difference in the complications (p = 0.24).
CONCLUSION: Management of patients with developmental hip dysplasia presenting after 6 months of age requires more surgical intervention but can result in satisfactory outcomes.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all patients from 2003 to 2012 who had the sole diagnosis of de-velopmental hip dysplasia, who presented before 18 months of age, and who had at least 2 years of follow-up. The cohort was then grouped based on their presentation before (BSM) or after (ASM) 6 months of age. The groups were compared for demographics, exam findings, and outcomes.
RESULTS: We identified 36 patients with presentation after 6 months and 63 patients who presented before 6 months. Hav-ing a normal newborn hip exam and unilateral involvement were risk factors for late presentation (p < 0.001). Only 6% (2/36) patients in the ASM group were successfully treated non-operatively; the ASM group underwent an average of 1.33 procedures. The odds of utilizing an open reduction for the primary procedure for the late presenting patient was 4.91 times higher than the early presenting group (p = 0.001). Limited hip range of motion, particularly hip external rotation, was the only significantly different out-come (p = 0.03). There was no significance difference in the complications (p = 0.24).
CONCLUSION: Management of patients with developmental hip dysplasia presenting after 6 months of age requires more surgical intervention but can result in satisfactory outcomes.