MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3944/aott.2013.2688

Медицинская библиотека · Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica · 2013

Characterization of powdered fish heads for bone graft biomaterial applications.

Oteyaka Mustafa Ozgür, Unal Hasan Hüseyin, Bilici Namık, Taşçı Eda

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to define the chemical composition, morphology and crystallography of powdered fish heads of the species Argyrosomus regius for bone graft biomaterial applications.

METHODS

Two sizes of powder were prepared by different grinding methods; Powder A (coarse, d50=68.5 µm) and Powder B (fine, d50=19.1 µm). Samples were analyzed using X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray fluorescence (XRF), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), thermogravimetry (TG), and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS).

RESULTS

The powder was mainly composed of aragonite (CaCO3) and calcite (CaCO3). The XRD pattern of Powder A and B matched standard aragonite and calcite patterns. In addition, the calcium oxide (CaO) phase was found after the calcination of Powder A. Thermogravimetry analysis confirmed total mass losses of 43.6% and 47.3% in Powders A and B, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The microstructure of Powder A was mainly composed of different sizes and tubular shape, whereas Powder B showed agglomerated particles. The high quantity of CaO and other oxides resemble the chemical composition of bone. In general, the powder can be considered as bone graft after transformation to hydroxyapatite phase.

Для цитирования: Oteyaka Mustafa Ozgür, Unal Hasan Hüseyin, Bilici Namık, Taşçı Eda. Characterization of powdered fish heads for bone graft biomaterial applications.. Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica. 2013. DOI: 10.3944/aott.2013.2688.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.