MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1038/s41372-025-02267-4

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025

Changes in lung aeration with high-flow nasal cannula compared to nasal CPAP in preterm infants.

Katheria Anup, Ines Felix, Hough Judith, Rich Wade, Morales Ana, Sanjay Shashank, Poeltler Debra, Finer Neil

Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To compare the degree of atelectasis in preterm infants on nasal continuous airway pressure (nCPAP) versus high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) at 8 L/min.

STUDY

DESIGN

A cross-over study of infants <29 weeks gestational age (GA) receiving nCPAP and underwent 6-hours of HFNC at 8 L/min before returning to nCPAP. Electrical Impedance Tomography was used to measure lung aeration.

RESULTS

78 infants with median GA of 27 weeks [26, 28] were studied. HFNC was non-inferior to CPAP across the 4 periods (overall mean 2.1 ± 2.9, lower bound of confidence interval -0.9). Infants that failed HFNC had higher dependent silent spaces (DSS) measurements (1.6[0.48, 4.7] vs 0.30[0.0, 2.7], P = 0.046).

CONCLUSION

This study of premature infants <29 weeks GA at birth demonstrated that HFNC was non-inferior to nCPAP as measured by DSS. Infants that failed HFNC had a higher percentage of DSS than those who tolerated HFNC for 6 hours suggesting decreased lung aeration.

CLINICALTRIALS: gov ID: NCT03700606.

Для цитирования: Katheria Anup, Ines Felix, Hough Judith, Rich Wade, Morales Ana, Sanjay Shashank, Poeltler Debra, Finer Neil. Changes in lung aeration with high-flow nasal cannula compared to nasal CPAP in preterm infants.. Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association. 2025. DOI: 10.1038/s41372-025-02267-4.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.